It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
i disagree with the whole chem trails are not cloud seeding idea, as many times where I am after a massive chem trail run and the haze sets in, in the afternoon the clouds build and the storms start, then other days its just the haze.
By taking advantage of this information in the sky, without any equipment, students can predict the weather. If the contrails are short (and there are few or no clouds in the sky) there is little moisture in the sky at high levels and chances are the next twelve to twenty-four hours will be clear.
If the contrails are long (and maybe clouds are already in the sky) the moisture content of the upper level of the sky is high and more clouds or even a storm is on the way.
The weather prediction is more dramatic when the sky is clear and the contrails are long. Then you can say on a clear day that tomorrow will be cloudy. Some days you can see a short trail in the morning and long trail in the afternoon; that tells you that moisture is moving in and you know it before the clouds come!
One easy to see obvious error is the use of the term "cloud seeding" as applied in this picture. But what about the remainder?
Vinegar evaporation thus has double beneficiary effect, giving us the conclusion, that the defense with VINEGAR (CH3COOH) against chemical dusting of our atmosphere is correct and reasonable, therefore we urge everybody, yes you who are reading this, to spill vinegar on a hot asphalt, to evaporate vinegar into the atmosphere or just buy a bottle of vinegar and leave it open on some remote location to evaporate during the day.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
chemtrails - setting a new standard for ignorance!
Originally posted by TheMagus
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
chemtrails - setting a new standard for ignorance!
i take it you live in bunker
as NZ is currently "enjoying" the wild weather,
the fruit of covert geo-engineering efforts?
you and the OP feel the need to tro *COUGH* trawl teh interwebs
for posting obvious baiting threads?
none are so blind as those who refuse to see...
none are so blind as those who refuse to see...
...meanwhile, agent weedwhacker proudbird is trolling CT videos on YT
having been banned from ATS for sock-puppetry [and rightly so]...
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by TheMagus
1-The OP does not contain a video. It's an "article" like would be found on a blog or in a magazine.
2-It has chemistry in it, actual equations that can be figured and affirmed or denied.
3-A post just a few before your's, from Ignorant Ape, breaks the chemistry apart, and reaches the decision (correctly) that the "chemtrail" claim is wrong, non-science, and nonsense.
If he/she is wrong, where and how?
4-Instead you choose the route described preemptively in the post before yours....non-answers with calls of troll, even if that word wasn't used.
5-You seem to be the only believer on this thread. You refusal to actually make a comment about the contents of the questioned "article," indeed, your admission that you didn't even look at it, shows it is something that cannot be defended. And your two posts without comment on the topic at hand is trollish.
It is a point often made here at ATS in this forum that the debunkers are trolls and don't present anything to prove our claims. Many "chemtrail" threads reach no more than a few pages; I expect this one will fade today. This is why...believers present "evidence", it gets debunked, then the believers start whining about the disinfo-troll-shill-deniers, instead of addressing our errors.
You guys don't get it. If we are wrong, prove it. If you can't, either don't reply or explain why you still believe. It's not just here on ATS, either. *As a debunker, I go all over the web, looking at the "chemtrail" believers sites as well. When a piece of information is proven wrong, why do even the "chemtrail" websites and professionals continue to use it? Case in point, the local "news" story from KSLA, and a test for barium. The reporter doesn't even say the numbers correctly along with his misinterpretation of the units. But this same wrong story is used over and over again...as recently as February 2013 by Geoengineeringwatch.com.
How is it possible in this age that people can continue to use errors to prove their beliefs? It's not just you, either. The OP post got FB "likes", good comments, and was "shared". The only ones who seem in denial are the believers, who continually deny that wrong information is wrong and continue to "believe" without research or question. It make "chemtrails" less a conspiracy and more a care-less belief system where facts are ignored and fiction encouraged.
1-you ascribe credibility to a fakebook-PRISM page, yet YT videos are "proof" of hoax?
2-stop doing whatever chemicals you're huffing would be my advice
3-3 years of college chemistry over 25 years ago told me those equations were bs
but you needed I.A. to "explain" it to you?
as believable as this agitprop*COUGH* thread
[when are the mods going to stamp HOAX on it btw?]
4-obvious is obvious: note how no one is biting
5-just giving you a taste of your own medicine
, yet YT videos are "proof" of hoax?