It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As you can see from above, the key point is "according to law" but for many years, acts of parliament have superceded common law.
while I continue to hold the said office I will TO THE BEST OF MY SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law."
Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett continues to expose the Illegitimacy of the incumbent British Monarchy in an interview with Dr. Jim Fetzer. The proposed changes to the Laws of Succession is an attempt by the Mafia to maintain their stronghold. Queen Victoria had a legitimate firstborn son who lived as the British Exilarch in Portugal. His descendants have a Legitimate and Superior Claim to the Throne of the United Kingdom.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by budski
The attached is another example of fantasy law.
Fantasy law is worthless in practice, because the authorities will take no notice of it.
This one is founded on the idea that breaking an oath is against God's law.
Nobody in the modern world will care about that.
So the only possible response to anyone in danger of being taken in by this nonsense is "Don't be silly".
Originally posted by happinness
What I find hard to understand is if the Queen is the head of the Church of England, how can she go round killing foxes and game for pleasure. Watch a horse get whipped and bet on the poor beast running for it's life for money.
Thing's most of us find extremely immoral and thoroughly unpleasant. What' makes her so nice? Why do people worship the royal family, when God said it is him that should be worshiped? Please enlighten me, because I really don't understand.
Originally posted by StarsInDust
reply to post by budski
Interesting find, and I never heard about this one, but as you can see the article(you linked us to) was dated May of 2011, and they haven't seemed to have acted on it yet, so they probably won't.
Originally posted by budski
I don't have the legal expertise to say whether this is right or wrong,
Originally posted by budski
but if we assume for the moment that this is correct ...