It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

They are digitally manipulating photos and video to make it look like the man has bloody hands!!!

page: 1
22
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:28 AM
link   

People you gotta start questioning everything...yes the incident happened but where's the blood in the original footage? We are being deceived in some way...they've been doing this for years....
edit on 23-5-2013 by beatbox because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:35 AM
link   
I suppose it is possible then to digitally remove the blood from his hands in a video as well....



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:38 AM
link   
You've got to question this, too. Surely if he had the original recording it would be more convincing just to play the full video, including the bits that ITV edited out. This video just uses the same bits as ITV, which makes it look like he's edited the blood out rather than ITV editing blood in. Plus a guy who's just killed someone, holding a machete, and having clean hands, seems more confusing than him having bloody hands.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:39 AM
link   
I can't watch the video as i'm at work but the blood is all over the pavement. They dragged his body into the road after they had butchered him.
Apologies in advance if i've misunderstood.
edit on 23/5/2013 by SilentE because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
I suppose it is possible then to digitally remove the blood from his hands in a video as well....


That's what I was thinking too.

This video would be much more believable it the creator had linked to the full, uncut, orginal video. They did not which makes me question if their accusation is true. Clearly they are claiming access to it, so why not share it as futher proof.
edit on 23-5-2013 by OneisOne because: typo, typo



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:43 AM
link   
If they gonna follow orders to kill from whoever(IRS, Al Qaeda or w/e group), im pretty sure its not hard to buy blood ink or at least, get blood from the body.

Its easy to get people rattled now a days.

"Kill this guy and shout something related to Islam."



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:44 AM
link   
reply to post by twfau
 

why no blood on his clothes then



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by beatbox

People you gotta start questioning everything...yes the incident happened but where's the blood in the original footage? We are being deceived in some way...they've been doing this for years....
edit on 23-5-2013 by beatbox because: (no reason given)


Ya, digital enhancement is needed to make his hands look bloodier after he tried to behead somebody.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:47 AM
link   
The ironic thing, in the actual proper sense of the word, is the footage without the blood looks considerably more digitally manipulated than the footage with the blood.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:47 AM
link   
From a quick look it seems as though the bloodied hands version has a reduced clarity as opposed to the non bloodied version. I could imagine you lose clarity by modification easily but it would be difficult to gain clarity. Im not an expert in this by any means though.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:49 AM
link   
Ok after seeing this video from the same uploader it seems like the media just inhanced the blood because you can see blood on the knives..looks orange in color.. My apologies people...



But it still raises the question to why they would darken/edit/manipulate the footage in the first place...
edit on 23-5-2013 by beatbox because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-5-2013 by beatbox because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by zedy63
reply to post by twfau
 

why no blood on his clothes then


Obviously he's an actor and it wasn't in the script.

that's where this thread is going, isn't it? It's inevitably pathetic.

A world full of scumbags and yet when they strike, it's an impossible thing.. it must be fake.

i give up



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:54 AM
link   
I wondered about this as well yesterday. When seeing his hands all bloody, I expected to see blood on his clothes as well. There was none. No way you can have that much blood on your hands and not on your clothes. It's not even on the cuffs of his sweatshirt. Yes we're being manipulated and the MSM is in on it.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:57 AM
link   
Yea and one reports a cleaver attack while the other claims a machete attack. Yes the media will bend a story to fit its needs.

On a serious note the guy hacked a guy to death and claims it, what more do some need.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bilk22
I wondered about this as well yesterday. When seeing his hands all bloody, I expected to see blood on his clothes as well. There was none. No way you can have that much blood on your hands and not on your clothes. It's not even on the cuffs of his sweatshirt. Yes we're being manipulated and the MSM is in on it.


Yes, that's absolutely right. The government arranged this and have been caught out by you because there's no way he couldn't have blood on his cuffs. Well done, the whole conspiracy has been busted. How rubbish is the government that they made such an error. They didn't expect you on the case did they?

Unless, of course, he rolled his sleeves up when he was callously hacking a man to pieces in the street.

Or took his coat off and put it on again in the 20 fricking minutes it took for the police to apprehend them.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 08:01 AM
link   
Well this may be true but it could of been just a creative producer that added the blood to sell more sensation porn. The propaganda used by political institutions called religions scare me more and have direct results of death and violence



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 08:03 AM
link   
I'm no expert but I'm pretty sure it would be hard to see blood on a black fabric unless you looked closely. On a low-resolution film I'd be doubtful it would show up.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 08:06 AM
link   
reply to post by beatbox
 


Why is everyone questioning the lack of blood ?
The victim was ploughed into by a car - on the footpath. Check the car and footpath for your blood.

Maybe, and I am assuming here, he had bled out by the time these monsters got to the butchery part.

Poor victim, poor family and friends of victim. You have my condolences ...

How about all the arm chair CSI people leave it to the experts ? Hmmm ?



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 08:08 AM
link   
reply to post by twfau
 


im sure if you had just beheaded someone there would be blood everywhere not just the palms of his hands



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 08:11 AM
link   
I can't watch because I'm at work, but I was reading something about this the other day and it is certainly pretty interesting.




top topics



 
22
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join