It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy
The only bloodlines the government cares about are the ones already in power.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Preservation of some mythical bloodline versus growing up without dad.....hmmmmmm..... tough one.
Originally posted by Nyiah
Erm, I'm a little confused here. Do you mean the enlistment requirements? If so, I'm not entirely clear on why they do not allow people with kids already to enlist. Otherwise, bloodlines are going plenty strong. I know 2 Army families, one with 4 kids, and one that just had their sixth(!!) Service isn't hampering their ability to have offspring at all.edit on 5/7/2013 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jepic
Enlistment requirements is indeed what I mean. Basically only people who have offsprings should be allowed to join the military. That's what I'm getting at.
Originally posted by collietta
reply to post by Jepic
The military will let people in who have families.
While you are in, you can have as many children as you want.
There is a limit when a recruit has a large family already. It has to do with supporting the family with a low rank.
A recruiter can explain this way better than I can. .
Originally posted by collietta
Originally posted by Jepic
Enlistment requirements is indeed what I mean. Basically only people who have offsprings should be allowed to join the military. That's what I'm getting at.
Most who have families are not 17 and 18 year olds. This age group is the easiest to mold into a good servicemember. Additionally, those with families may not be interested in the risk involved with the military. The government would also have to pay much more money for dependents if they recruited only family members.
From a government standpoint, it's smarter to recruit people out of highschool and haven't started a life yet.
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by collietta
reply to post by Jepic
The military will let people in who have families.
While you are in, you can have as many children as you want.
There is a limit when a recruit has a large family already. It has to do with supporting the family with a low rank.
A recruiter can explain this way better than I can. .
What I'm saying is only let people in who have have at least one child. And don't let in people who have no children.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Jepic
Im sure it exists as some sort of genetic string but why preserve it? Humans arent exactly endangered and who my great-great-great-great-great-great parents were is of no consequence to me or my kids or anyone else.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by Jepic
I got a better idea.
Like the Kings of old used to do.
They would be the generals in the field and lead their troops into combat.
Let's see how good their leadership skills really are.
And let's see if their warface is as good as Mel Gibsons.
He's definitely crazy.
Originally posted by skitzspiricy
17 year old: I want to enlist.
Recruiter: Go and have a sprog first to preserve your bloodline, and come back to me.
Not the best recruitment statergy is it?
edit on 7-5-2013 by skitzspiricy because: (no reason given)