It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
In this day I would think parents would be smart enough not to take nude photos with their little ones since there is such a disgusting appetite for those pictures by the depraved who are very willing to pay just to view them.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
An employee would not set off an alarm if the pictures were as sweet and as the article shows. imo
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Char-Lee
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.
They didn't protect the kids. They traumatized the kids and subjected them to a genital examination.
The kids didn't need protecting from the parents - they needed protected from the Child Protection agency.
Child pornography on the Internet is another growing problem. Pedophiles document sexual abuse of children and use the material to sell or exchange on the Internet. In addition to the abuse these children suffer, images of the abuse circulate worldwide across the Internet for many years, repeating the abuse.
Originally posted by Evil_Santa
What would have been the outcome for the parents who don't have $75,000 handy to pay legal fees?
Totally disgusting, and those walmart employees should be fired. They've clearly shown they lack the understanding required to distinguish between child porn and family photography.
If WM had done nothing and the parents turned out to be pervs the public would still be screaming for their heads.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Personally I would feel the horror of people thinking I did something like sell pictures of my kids but i would be glad someone gives a darn about the kids too. An employee would not set off an alarm if the pictures were as sweet and as the article shows. imo
Originally posted by wingsfan
Just when you think you finally seen it all in another thread, then you get this. What flipping planet does someone come from that doesn't know about these types of family photos? We can assume the wal-mart worker was of suspect IQ, that goes without saying, but law enforcement actual carrying out medical exams for abuse? And then putting them on the registry?
All involved should be sued to hell in back, then sued again for ruining our country with this endless insanity.
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Originally posted by Char-Lee
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.
No, and neither have you. You don't blindly "protect the kids" based on your point of view. What about the point of view of the children? You do realize that these children were ripped from their family correct? How in gods name is traumatizing these children by removing them from their parents home in any way "protecting the kids" when there was nothing wrong done in the first place?
People that immediately assume the worst and defend their position to death make me sick. What happened to properly investigating a situation before acting? I guess many are right that here in Amerika you are now guilty until proven innocent. Hope that the next family is as well off as this one or they might just permanently lose their children because of some schmucks assumptions.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
When did YOU see the photos in question? Now all of you are judging the worker and her bosses and the child protective persons all in the wrong and YOU never saw the photos in question!
Originally posted by AnonyWarp
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids.
In order to protect the kids, lets now ban all devices able to capture / record an image.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Yes well if you has sick parents maybe you would feel differently.
Who is going to stop them if they are selling pictures of you...do you think that is a parents right?
Child pornography on the Internet is another growing problem.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Char-Lee
In this day I would think parents would be smart enough not to take nude photos with their little ones since there is such a disgusting appetite for those pictures by the depraved who are very willing to pay just to view them.
Seriously? You are arguing that people shouldn't take pictures of their kids naked in the bath as they may fall into the hands of pedophiles?
What?
Originally posted by Char-Lee
An employee would not set off an alarm if the pictures were as sweet and as the article shows. imo
$75,000 later, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled that the photographs were not, in fact, pornographic.
ABC
reply to post by Char-Lee
No just don't lay your little girls on the floor with their legs spread for daddy to take pictures.
but there are a few after the bath. Three of the girls are naked, lying on a towel with their arms around each other, and we thought it was so cute.”
Originally posted by Char-Lee
What do you think the system is for? Why do you think it even exists? They are the ones who saw the evidence and tried to do their job! I don't need to see it to know that. Every time they ere on the side of not protecting a kid and something goes wrong what happens?
Later the kids are older and come forward and say, where were you when it was reported to you you did nothing!
Originally posted by wingsfan
Originally posted by Char-Lee
When did YOU see the photos in question? Now all of you are judging the worker and her bosses and the child protective persons all in the wrong and YOU never saw the photos in question!
No I didn't, but the judge didn't see the porn connection and since I assume most everyones parents take these types of photos, I would expect innocent till proven guilty to stand, not let's fiddle your kids in the exam room till we know for sure.
Originally posted by AnonyWarp
reply to post by Char-Lee
No just don't lay your little girls on the floor with their legs spread for daddy to take pictures.
but there are a few after the bath. Three of the girls are naked, lying on a towel with their arms around each other, and we thought it was so cute.”
From abcnews.go.com...
Sorry , but i dont see anywhere in the article the girls were spreading their legs for daddy
maybe you have a problem ?