It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Angle
reply to post by Konoyaro
There is no purpose in this meditation, the mind is made to think. It would be usefull if in the not thinking state one is able to make whatever thought pop up he wished to think about.
Don't be dead, not?
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by ImaFungi
I think I understand what Itsnowagain means when saying "I is just a thought".
Think about it. Thoughts are arising, there are eyes which seeing, ears which are hearing, a body which is moving...
and then we think "I see" instead of "the ears are seeing", or we think "my body..." instead of "the body"...
When people say "I" they refer to the body, or the mind. They believe themselves to be the body or the thoughts/emotions, and sometimes even both. Sometimes people even believe themselves to be past-actions combined with what they BELIEVE will be the future...
But if 'you' are the thought/emotion, then what is the silence that the thought/emotion is arising in? Aren't 'you' aware of your own thoughts and emotions? Then how can you just be the mind?
Aren't you aware of the body? Then how can you be the body?
If you are aware of it, it is not the FULL and COMPLETE you. You are AWARE OF the body and the thought and the emotion, so none of this stuff is the FULL "you". The full you would be the 'you' that is being aware of the body, thought,and emotion...
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by ImaFungi
You still didn't answer the question. You said "I" refer to "the totality of MY being" such as "my body" , "my thoughts" but no where did you actually identify an "I".
Let me ask again...
Who/what is this "I" that is in possession of thoughts, emotions, and the body?
If you say "MY consciousness" then who is this "I" that possesses consciousness?edit on 5-2-2013 by arpgme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by ImaFungi
So the answer is this:
The "I" that is the possessor of thoughts, emotions, and the body is the thoughts, emotions, and the body itself. If this is the case then there is no "possessor" (I) as self-possession as self is not considered possession. Possession is what happens when one entity/force controls another entity/force, not when an entity is controlling itself.
If the thoughts, emotions, and the body is self-possessed (which is not possession at all) then there is no room for "I" (a possessor).
The world is a mystery and so are we, how could you ever expect it to be any other way.