It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Losonczy
You can still feel that the church part is not accepting of gays and they shouldn't be able to "marry" in your church, while supporting that committed gay couples ought to have certain legal/civil rights as citizens.
Originally posted by Losonczy
Originally posted by RANT
"President Bush said in an interview this past weekend that he disagreed with the Republican Party platform opposing civil unions of same-sex couples and that the matter should be left up to the states."
I think there is a big difference between "civil unions/legal rights" and the "sanctity of marriage issue". Although many Republicans are Christian in orientation and may feel that God frowns on gay "marriage", I think that the Republican platform has always been one of individual rights and the government, certainly at the federal level, keeping its nose out of an individual's decisions.
Originally posted by Losonczy
Well poo. I was just trying to play devil's advocate. I pretty much agree that he's flip-flopping. I just don't necessarily agree that his flip-flopping is against the "Republican Agenda". It does definitely appear to be against the current Republican agenda...i just still have some respect for the Republican Agenda of years ago...of Fiscal conservatism and individual rights.
Originally posted by RANT
Understood. It's just that the Party of Reagan is dead. Or rather called Libertarian now.
Originally posted by Amuk
Whould you believe when I voted last week, if they wasnt a Libertarian candidate I voted Democrat because at the local level anyhow they are for MORE personal freedom than the Republicans?