It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Report: GOP senators won’t confirm Kerry until Clinton testifies on Benghazi

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:05 AM
link   
washingtonexaminer.com...


Republican senators will refuse to confirm Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., as Secretary of State until the nation’s current top diplomat, Hillary Clinton, testifies about her handling of the Benghazi terrorist attack.

“The Senate is expected to take up Kerry’s nomination in early January, but multiple Republican senators have already said they won’t agree to a vote on Kerry’s nomination until Clinton testifies about the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,” The Cable’s Josh Rogin notes.


Seems that this whole Benghazi incident isn't going away quietly. It looks as though Hilary is not going to have much choice but to testify. She is such a liar. She falls and gets a concussion then falls ill the other times she was supposed to testify. Give me a break. It's like a 7 year old crying about a tummy ache to skip school. I just worry her testimony will be given privately. There needs to be a big push for her to testify publicly, but who knows if that happens.

Remember, all of this was blamed on a Youtube video and a protest that didn't exist. We all know that story is bull. It should be obvious that Obama and everyone else involved knew the story was bull. There is an intentional and deliberate coverup going of a major, major crime(s). There are even reports that Obama has a secret CIA prison around the area of the attack, among other things. The reasons aren't fully known, but hopefully, they will be.



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:09 AM
link   
He he he, this is funny.Still don't think it will be long before the other JFK . Take's his place.Just a hunch.Can we impeach another Clinton?

edit on 27-12-2012 by 13th Zodiac because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 


Not sure what one has to do with the other...

Hillary was going to testify anyways when she was better. Any proof she faked her concussion? Or just another accusation on the internet...?


Sounds like another excuse by the G OP to filibuster in more creative obvious ways.
edit on 27-12-2012 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 


But what if the dog ate Hillary's notes about Benghazi? Or maybe Sandy Berger stole her notes. Or maybe she left them in her briefcase with the Rose Law Firm billing records. Or maybe she left her notes at Vince Foster's grave when she went to pay respects.

Or what if the wakes up with a tummy ache?

Those mean Republicans wouldn't make her testify then, would they?



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Someone give Hillary a cigar.

Lewinski brand.



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 01:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 


Not sure what one has to do with the other...

Hillary was going to testify anyways when she was better. Any proof she faked her concussion? Or just another accusation on the internet...?


Sounds like another excuse by the G OP to filibuster in more creative obvious ways.
edit on 27-12-2012 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


Nah, no proof she faked anything. If there was proof of that, it would be major news already. It just seems obvious to me that she is lying. They already have lied about everything else that had to do with the attack, why wouldn't they lie about this? The government lies about everything all the time. Seems to me that Hilary thought she could swindle her way out of testifying.



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 03:52 AM
link   
first, libya is supposed to be a free and sovereign country.

unfortunately american hypocrisy gets in the way of that concept.

everybody says, america should have sent in the seals or the marines.

do you know what its called when a foreign country sends in its troops to another country to kill.

war.

it would be like the chinese sending in 100,000 troops to new york to protect its embassy against "free tibet" protestors and killing hundreds of potential americans, who may or may not be shooting at the consul.

it doesn't work that way unless you want to declare war.


edit on 27-12-2012 by randomname because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 04:12 AM
link   
2 subjects here
testimony of clinton
gop confirmation of john kerry

well
clinton's testimony...would be a farce at best...behind that office she held was the CFR
no one dares step on those toes

here comes johnny
simple research of who he is
one would know CFR is just moving a "trusted pawn" in position
no one dares steps on these toes

currently he sits as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee....CSFR

secretary of state to CFR relations
anyone not versed in CFR to secretary of state should watch this short lil 2 min video
where clinton admits the CFR tells the govt it's agenda
www.youtube.com...

anyone desire insight on john kerry
linked here...en.wikipedia.org...
one should notice under his yale years... one of the skull n bones brotherhood too



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 04:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by randomname
first, libya is supposed to be a free and sovereign country.

unfortunately american hypocrisy gets in the way of that concept.

everybody says, america should have sent in the seals or the marines.

do you know what its called when a foreign country sends in its troops to another country to kill.

war.

it would be like the chinese sending in 100,000 troops to new york to protect its embassy against "free tibet" protestors and killing hundreds of potential americans, who may or may not be shooting at the consul.

it doesn't work that way unless you want to declare war.


edit on 27-12-2012 by randomname because: (no reason given)

have you put much research into the UN
all nations must fail so that one nation can rise...The United Nation
the nwo is the UN
libya had to fail
america has to fail
crude i know

it's not american hypocrisy
it's UN agenda
most don't know these UN agenda's but they are here
UN agenda 21 would blow most away upon comprehending it
most fuss over gun control in usa but don't look at UN small arms agenda
i know i won't be alone connecting all the dots to the UN
edit on 27-12-2012 by lasvegasteddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 

She's not known for being the most honest person around....what's to stop her from lying under oath....like "I don't remember" and all the other excuses that are used to evade questions??



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join