It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Arrest warrant sought for Tony Blair

page: 3
19
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by PadawanGandalf
 


Where was the War Crime Tribunal when it came to Saddam or Osama?

Just the burning of the oil fields in Kuwait by Saddam's order should have been enough for an arrest warrant by the United Nations for Eco Terrorism.

And...


"Osama bin Laden took credit for and supported acts around the world which amounted to crimes against humanity," said Claudio Cordone, senior director at Amnesty International.



posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 11:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by mattthew
Malaysia found them both guilty last year and no one has arrested them yet.
rt.com...


Actually, Malaysia never found them guilty, a kangaroo court set up in Malaysia did. It had no legal weight. Just read the news article.


It was a sharia law court.



posted on Aug, 30 2012 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by WarminIndy
It was a sharia law court.


Yes, a kangaroo court "a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted"



posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by WarminIndy
 


From Sunna Shia Law

People, if you do not think this is serious or real, and you think just being nice to them will make them nice to you, read what they themselves are saying.

Sharia law is inhuman and injust. This is from the document The Islamic World System, read what it says about you democratic loving, free speech believers.

The important thing about Sharia law is that it is perfect and sacred. Law based upon democratic process is offensive to Islam because such law is based upon people. Sharia law is based upon the Koran and Mohammed, the only perfect guidance. Therefore, it is an offence to Islam for Muslims to have to live under democratic constitutional law. This is the reason that Muslims want to replace our banking laws with Sharia law and replace our family law with Sharia law.


They do not want your democracy or freedom, they make it very plain they want you to be their dhimmis.

slam demands that Muslims form their own political units without kafir influence. The thin end of the longest wedge is to demand that Muslims live outside kafir law in family and banking. Already, in England Islamic family law supercedes British law in families. There is no end to Islamic demands for power. So one day, Muslims in Britain will live under their own law, judges and police. The final stage is when Sharia law replaces English law in totality and kafirs have to live under Sharia law as dhimmis. The British have decided not to oppose this process, but for it to happen slowly and smoothly.


Who have determined to change banking laws? The Jews? Did the Jews write this document? No, the Sunna Islam muslims have. They have told you to go blaming the Jews for controlling the banks, then you did while they set about changing the laws. Good for you for being distracted and misplacing blame, you are a good dhimmi.

Dhimmis The Sharia is very detailed how the dhimmi will live under Islamic domination. O11.1 a formal agreement with Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Samarians, Sabians, and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham of one of the other prophets. o11.3 such an agreement is only valid when the subject peoples: (a) follow the rules of Islam (b) and pay the kafir poll tax (jizya) o11.5 Kafir subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they: (1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness. (2) Are distinguished from Muslims by dress (3) Are not greeted by "as Salamu alakym" (peace to you). (4) Must keep to the side of the street; (5) May not build higher than the Muslims' buildings (6) Are forbidden to openly display wine or pork. ( or to ring church bells or display crosses) recite the Torah or Gospels aloud, or make public display of funerals and feast days. (7) And are forbidden to build new churches.


You want to read these yourself? Reliance of the Traveller, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, by Amana Publications, 1994.

Who wrote this book? Sunna Muslims. Do you really want sharia law? Sorry to tell you, according to them, you already are.

It was a court like this that issued the fatwas. It is they who manipulate the conspiracy theories.



posted on Aug, 31 2012 @ 12:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by WarminIndy
It was a sharia law court.


Yes, a kangaroo court "a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted"


They do not see sharia as a mock court.



posted on Sep, 3 2012 @ 02:07 PM
link   
Just found this in todays guardian.www.guardian.co.uk... ny-blair-the-hague-iraq-war



new topics

top topics
 
19
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join