It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of most basic laws of science is the Law of the Conservation of Energy. Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be changed from one form to another.
Originally posted by Agarta
My theory is that the Universe collapses into itself and explodes out the opposite way.Matter vrs. Antimatter. Picture, if you will, the sphere of the universe being sucked into its center. Instead of the explosion spreading into this physical realm it explodes into its opposite. Then it is sucked back to its center and explodes back into this one. The cycle continues back and forth. If my theory is correct than what they are getting images of would be 2 Universes ago.
"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discoveres what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly be replaced by something even more bizzare and inexplicable.
...There is another theory which states that this has already happened."
-Douglas Adams
Originally posted by 3n19m470
reply to post by solargeddon
Well, that's what happens when someone becomes a robotic-debunker/compulsive-naysayer... eventually people stop listening to what they have to say.
Sorry, are you calling me names ?!
How very ...... ignorant of you, We can't just buy the concept, of the concentric rings being a remnant of a bygone universe, it has to be proven beyond doubt, plus science is progressive, the sourcing of those articles was entirely relevant to the thread, and gave an alternative perspective.
I am being rude, when I say how's the weather there in 2d land ?!
Your right, no it doesnt, scientists are always revising theories all the time, theories that have been scientifically concrete fro centuries, are then turned on their heads, "oh well, yes, we thought that was right, but actualy......" you get my drift?
Originally posted by magma
reply to post by VoidHawk
Even if there was an anouncement to say that universe is exactly the way a scientist says it is does that make it right? Does it make it real?
Originally posted by DARREN1976
Your right, no it doesnt, scientists are always revising theories all the time, theories that have been scientifically concrete fro centuries, are then turned on their heads, "oh well, yes, we thought that was right, but actualy......" you get my drift?
Originally posted by magma
reply to post by VoidHawk
Even if there was an anouncement to say that universe is exactly the way a scientist says it is does that make it right? Does it make it real?