Romney aide to Haaretz: After he’s elected, Iran will see there’s a new sheriff in town

This is to be expected of Romney, it was his position during the debates. If this guy is elected the possibility of a major confrontation is left looming, not to say it won't be anyways. Sad thing is is between him and Obama, Obama's not beating the war drum.

(Same source as below)

In wide-ranging interview, Former ambassador Richard Williamson says U.S. Republican candidate will make military threats against Tehran credible, arm Syria's rebels, and visit Israel before going anywhere else.

Mitt probably don't have to worry about arming the Syrian rebels, their well armed and get paychecks, but this stance towards Iran is worrisome to say the least.

haar etz.com

"When Mitt Romney is president, Iran will understand that there is a new sheriff in town and that his position is that the only thing worse than the U.S. using force would be for Iran to have nuclear weapons”, according to Richard Williamson, a senior foreign policy adviser to the Republican presidential candidate.

What's most alarming about this entire issue and Romney's drum beating, was his response to the gaffe that took place between Obama and Medvedev. In which he labels Russia "his" number one geopolitical foe.

theatlanticwire.com

Calling Russia our "number one geopolitical foe" in a CNN interview Monday, Mitt Romney rather unproductively distracted everyone from focusing on the critique he was making of President Obama. The Romney and Obama campaigns have been fighting back and forth Monday over Obama's comments to Russia's president Dmitri Medvedev -- caught on a live mic -- that after his reelection, he'd have more "flexibility" on missile defense issues. Romney's camp called the remark a sign Obama would campaign on one policy and implement another.

(Interview with CNN January 12, 2012)


Being left with another 4 years of Obama or a Romney in the W.H. leaves America in a catch--22.

reply to post by Daedal


God, you would think that these SoB's would be tired of war by now.

So who is Romney working for? The American people or Israel? Nothing but another dog on the leash of Israel and a traitor.

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL


Pfft, hes an Israeli lapdog. These idiots are very determined to spark off a Major Multinational war because thats whats going to eventually happen.

That's why when its between he(Romney) and Obama, I hope Obama gets in. At least he has been resisting the Israeli demands/commands lately. Notice the media back-lashing Obama the last year. Romney is a warmonger equal to the Bush's. I know by voting for the lesser of two evils, I'm still voting evil.. but there is who to vote for now?

reply to post by disfugured


I dont agree with you voting for Obama based on one issue but I will say this. That is the ONLY thing I like about Obama, he doesnt kiss "Bibis" ass.

reply to post by Juggernog


Do you mind elaborating on that one issue?

I get to vote for two different countries due to having a dual citizenship. I voted against Harper the last time because he partook in the 2008 Bilderberg meeting and sold out to the Banks. I voted for a man whom died not soon after the Prime minister election which I found strange.. but thats an entire other issue. I'm just sick of this garbage in all our political spectrum's.

Edit:

What will you elect to do.. if you don't mind me asking. I like you despise both political parties for their treasonous acts disguised as American representatives. Are you just not gonna vote?

I find it interesting that Romney thinks the US president has a right to be the World Sheriff. This is exactly whats is wrong with people like Romney he thinks he owns the world as well as you.

reply to post by disfugured

Do you mind elaborating on that one issue?

Which issue bro? Voting for someone based on one thing?

Ah ok nvm i got it.

Are you just not gonna vote?

Probably not. I consider myself a Republican but I refuse to be shackled by any parties platforms, I am not a full conservative and I sure as hell not a liberal.
Being from Texas, I was a Bush fan but he is responsible for starting our downhill slide with the wars he started but now Obama is finishing it with careless spending and socialist views.


The Republican party cant seem to nominate an electable candidate. Mc Cain was a joke, completely unelectable and he beat out Romney last election for the nomination.

At one point in my life I knew a woman who was married to a Mormon man. She told me that "The Mormons believe that they are part of the "chosen" of Israel."

To me I wonder if this is just politics or if there is some weird tie in to Willard's ("Mitt's) religion.

Either way, I don't believe that war is what this country needs to spend BILLION$ more on.

reply to post by Juggernog


Thanks for responding. I like to consider myself as a "true" republican (minus Christian or any religious beliefs) but as you mentioned.. there are none electable.

I see Romney as a larger threat to America than Obama.. despite both being against what being a true American in about.

reply to post by disfugured


Bush betrayed the country as well as the Republican Party. One of the issues that they base their platform on is "smaller government" but Bush is responsible for creating a new Dept, the first time thats happened in years.
Now, the DHS are the single biggest threat that our Nation has faced in a long time. They are nothing more than the East German Stazi or worse, Hitlers Gestapo.

Calling Russia our "number one geopolitical foe" in a CNN interview Monday, Mitt Romney ...

The primary issue for the next election is becoming painfully clear, do you value your existance?

Life can be complex and hard at times but there is a solution, we will exterminate most if not all life on this planet. Imagine, no more bills, no more late for work, no more arguments. There is a solution and it is waiting for all of you. Please note, those not dead will be be made into zombie, microchipped slaves, weither or not they feel any pain is irrelivent.

Mitt is a business man and fully realizes that America is in the business of war.

Ask yourself these questions...

Who profits from war? And who pays for it?

costofwar.com...

reply to post by olaru12

Who profits from war? And who pays for it?

Who profits from war? Corporations.
And who pays for it? Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen

Originally posted by olaru12
Mitt is a business man and fully realizes that America is in the business of war.

Ask yourself these questions...

Who profits from war? And who pays for it?

costofwar.com...

Here's an interesting perspective: www.pagetutor.com...

What $1Trillion in cash looks like. Take a look at olaru12's link, and imagine those numbers in cash.

Someone - not you - gets that cash.