It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Social conservatives and libertarians are taking opposite sides in a Supreme Court case involving the regulation of indecency on broadcast television. In FCC v. Fox Television Stations Inc., the Court will decide if the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) violated broadcast networks Freedom of Speech when they were fined for profanity and nudity.
Gacek also believes that the broadcast networks should be set aside as a place where consumers know they can watch TV without inadvertently being exposed to indecency.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
Personally, I think too many people are happy blaming others for poor parenting skills. I think it is the responsibility of the parent to monitor a child's activities while watching television, and more importantly, internet usage.
Originally posted by nwdogg1982
There isn't a single clause in our Constitution that provides any level of the federal government with the power to regulate broadcast transmissions, based on moral decency. That type of regulation needs to be handled at the state level. People in Kansas, I'm sure, would have a different opinion on what is appropriate than the people in, say, New Jersey or New York. So, yes, the FCC has far overstayed its welcome.
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by Cosmic911
It is unconstitutional. It is a violation of freedom of expression/speech. If you don't want your child seeing or watching certain things, then block the channels and pay attention to what your child is watching - it's that simple.
There are also ratings to help you know if the show is appropriate for children. If you have rating why do we still need censorship? It is up to the parents to monitor what their child is watching.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by Forevever
I think my beer just went up my nose! Ha ha
If you did that at 8 years old, shouldn't you be working for the FBI now or CIA by now..,lol