It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta let slip on Sunday the big open secret that Washington war hawks don’t want widely known: Iran is not developing nuclear weapons.
Appearing on CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday, Panetta admitted that despite all the rhetoric, Iran is not pursuing the ability to split atoms with weapons, saying it is instead pursuing “a nuclear capability.”
That “capability” falls in line with what Iran has said for years: that it is developing nuclear energy facilities, not nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by THEDUDE86
reply to post by trustnothing
If they looked for uranium they were looking for a nuke
They already have enough material to make 1 or 2 small bombs. What they don't have is a delivery device. Some device would need to air burst, and travel over 300 miles...Iran just isn't there yet, but 6 Months from now this will be huge news
Originally posted by THEDUDE86
reply to post by trustnothing
If they looked for uranium they were looking for a nuke
They already have enough material to make 1 or 2 small bombs. What they don't have is a delivery device. Some device would need to air burst, and travel over 300 miles...Iran just isn't there yet, but 6 Months from now this will be huge news
edit on 10-1-2012 by THEDUDE86 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chaztekno
Thats all well and good and im glad they have admitted it, but building nuclear reactors in a major earth quake zone is an accident waiting to happen, I fail to see how any earth quake 'safe guards' that are built in can perfectly protect the reactor and guarantee safety for the local and not so local population. Stopping them now is a good idea in my opinion, what ever the means.
Originally posted by chaztekno
Thats all well and good and im glad they have admitted it, but building nuclear reactors in a major earth quake zone is an accident waiting to happen, I fail to see how any earth quake 'safe guards' that are built in can perfectly protect the reactor and guarantee safety for the local and not so local population. Stopping them now is a good idea in my opinion, what ever the means.
Originally posted by DaarkSyde2012
Are you serious? What about Fukushima? I think there was more than one reactor damaged there, don't you?edit on 10-1-2012 by DaarkSyde2012 because: (no reason given)