Revenge Tattoo - Women Sues Ex-husband for Tattooing a Pile of Crap on Her Back

unskilled artist, but IDK if it even looks is real. Too low quality of a picture.

I am guessing that the reason it is not as good as a regular tattoo is because he wanted to do it fast, so it could be completed in one sitting. I don't know much about tattoos, but that is my guess. I wonder if the paper she signed will hold up, since he got her inebriated.

Actually, we don't really know how drunk she was, but she should have thought something was up if she was still coherent. Still, the guy should have known that she would at the very least get someone to beat the crap out of him, although she went the legal route, which was probably the smartest.

I bet she wins, although I could be wrong. It was extremely funny, but you are still getting your revenge in a pretty nasty way, since she will have that for life. If he would have made it smaller at least she could have had it turned into something else.

I suppose she may be able to have it removed, but I don't know how far the technology has progressed, or how painful and lengthy the process is.

reply to post by iforget


You ruined my day

Been proved a fake all
www.thesmokinggun.com...
Thanks to Iforget for the link

A couple things don't quite make sense to me about this:

For one, the tattoo looks completely healed, no raising or redness.
Would anyone here with a tattoo wait till it healed before you looked at it?
Maybe it is for the suit, but I would imagine that if not that night, by at least the next day, charges of somesort would of been filed. And pictures would have been taken.

Another is the drinking part of it, I know someone already mentioned that, but I know better, as I am sure most anyone who has got a tattoo. None the less a tattoo artist who would be willing to tattoo someone one purpose while intoxicated.

While I do find it humorous (if true), it is awfully cruel.


This is what I think if by chance this is real.

At least it is done only in black ink.
At least he took it easy on the shading and quality so it could be easily covered. I mean if she was planning on having narnia on her back, then any talented artist should be able to cover that up.

Originally posted by boymonkey74
Been proved a fake all

www.thesmokinggun.com...
Thanks to Iforget for the link

edit on 29-11-2011 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)

Really!

I just read the smoking gun and found a huge hole in their so called Debunking. I went to County Records for Montgomery Ohio, free database search and found both people. Here is a screenshot. Do it yourself.

Maybe if they learned how to spell ( Fitzgerald ) correctly, they could debunk a story when they get bigger.

The story could be BS, but people trying to debunk it are not doing a good job.

www.clerk.co.montgomery.oh.us...

Additionally, a review of the Nexis database turns up no “Rossie Brovent,” or, in fact, anyone with that surname. And a search for “Ryan Fitzjerald” (with or without the middle initial “L”) turns up nobody with that name.

Didn't someone tattoo a penis on a man's back before? Jeeez, make sure you don't have a bad relationship with whoever is doing your tat art.

reply to post by Realtruth

Ooops my bad not going on thaat site again

reply to post by InvisibleAlbatross


sorry

someone will probably come along
and say they are liberal socialist scumbag liars
or some such thing
I don't know


wait looks like they already did err sort of

there is this honestly I have no knowledge of the story and haven't seen the tat pic from it but the link could back the smoking guns debunk if the dates don't match up too well

Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by Realtruth

 

Ooops my bad not going on thaat site again

No worries friend.

We debunk the debunker's.

We deny ignorance.

And even will admit when we lie to ourselves.

It's all in good fun.

Peace out,

RT

Originally posted by reficul
reply to post by snowspirit

 

this is incorrect. woman are actually easier to work on then men(extra layer of fat,& higher pain tollerance for child birth and the like)
the bleeding thing is a problem when people do drink before getting inked.(booze thins your blood)
ya the hooch may kill the pain a bit,but it makes it sloppy for the artist,especially when your bobing all around!
plus your more likely to get heavier scabbing from excess bleeding.
GET YOUR TATTOO SOBER YOU`LL ENJOY THE EXPERIENCE BETTER!

I had no idea we were easier to work on
I always just thought we got the good prices because the guys tattooing us like the intimate places we tend to put them.....
I have a small one, about 2 inches, it didn't hurt much at all.

She must have been a real mess by the time he finished, getting her tanked first.

Removal techniques have improved a lot I've heard, but something that big, she needs a good freestyle artist to turn it into something else.

i like how people are calling in to question the quality of the art work.
the guy drew a pile of # on his cheating girlfriends back, i dont think he was going for an award.

but anyway, theyre both a$$holes. but she started it.

im not going to lie, i kind of like it. it has a kind of childrens book like quality. sort of like a whinnie the pooh (no pun intended) type art. lol

She can always get another tattoo artist to turn the pile of crap into a beehive and the flies into bees. With the amount of money she's going to collect, she'll be able to afford the change.

reply to post by iforget

True or false, can't tell from the evidence thus far. I was able to look up the Fitzgerald divorce on the County web site - and the names fit the tale. That does not mean the tale is true. All it means is two people with names that fit the story got divorced. I see no evidence of tattoos or other explanation for the divorce. That doesn't mean it wasn't justified, just that we don't know the reason. Perhaps the divorce is real but the story and pic are fake?

The play on her supposed last name in the story as "Brovent" is clever and fits the story as ==> "Bro" plus "Vent"....? A true story or some dude's tattoo revenge, or perhaps just his internet revenge on his ex (deserved or not) in all it's gloried and possibly faked or photoshopped details? Maybe time will tell... Whichever it is, I think it is scary that our lives can be so publically shamed or slandered on the web these days. There go the days of bravado, of "I would stick to my guns no matter what they throw at me". How sad it is, when anybody who can start a story can ruin someone's life, true or not? The story is very funny... What is sad is that we can't laugh freely imagining it to be true, and safely ridicule the foolish woman, and likewise we can't laugh freely imagining it to be false, and be sure it never happened. The stakes are high either way.

Originally posted by iforget
smoking gun

funny yes, true no?

Touche', good find! While the story is obviously a fabrication, the tattoo may indeed be real. The irony is the young lady probably had it done intentionally. It is amazing, and I do mean AMAZING at what kind of bizarre and downright ugly and disgusting things people will get permanently tattooed on their bodies. A steaming pile of doo doesn't even rank anywhere near the "extreme" end of things.

reply to post by Realtruth


Two words.

SOLID GOLD !

reply to post by SavedOne


i agree ive been tattooing for nearly ten years now and seen many strange tatz and turned many more bizzare tatz away . if that girl did have that put on her back i think she needs her head sortin out but whatever tickles ur pickle as my nana used to say lol and to the so called artist i think its time to give up your irons fella . it took me years to build my reputation and i wouldnt throw it away just for revenge

Originally posted by Realtruth

Originally posted by reficul
i'm a tattoo artist,and the artwork is really bad! i think if the 'artist' actually did attempt a scene from narnia,it would still look like a big pile of crap!!!

That is the first thing I thought too!

Crappy Job!

You don't know that...maybe he's a great artist...but unless someone really wanted a pile of # tattooed on them, he would do a great job. He was tattooing his cheating ex's back, so it SHOULD look like crap....imho of course

reply to post by JiggyPotamus


Your post made me laugh. When you said he should have made it smaller so she could've turned it in to something else, all I could think of was a chocolate ice cream cone! Man I feel so bad for that girl. That was some nasty revenge! Whatever happened to eye for an eye? He should've just slept with one of her friends. You know...even things out.
I am kidding, I think a divorce would have been the appropriate action. Looks like she cheated on the wrong dude,