It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not trying to get Bible thumpy on you, but it seemed the best way to respond.
Originally posted by Puppet27Master
reply to post by charles1952
[quoteSilly man So a man who is suppose to lead the way yet 18 years of his life are unaccounted for, at least in the Bible, and this is of no concern to you? Very limited views you live by. Christianity, or any other religion for that matter, is but a stepping stone. Think outside the box for which the church has put you. It's quite simple, just think of it like a story you were reading as a young child as if you were being re-conditioned all over again and may you see the light. Reach out from underneath that Thumb they have you under and finally begin your journey to self-enlightenment.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Akragon
Dear Akragon,
I stand before you naked in my ignorance. Until this thread I had not heard of Issa. But I respect your opinion and will look into it.
At first glance, I'm surprised that His followers wouldn't have been told about His travels and didn't mention them, but that's certainly no proof they didn't happen.
With respect,
Charles1952
These and other criticisms Notovitch sought to answer in his preface to the London edition (1895):
"The truth indeed is that the verses of which I give a translation in my book are probably not to be found in any kind of catalogue, either of the Tandjur or of the Kandjur.
They are to be found scattered through more than one book without any title; consequently they could not be found in catalogues of Chinese or Tibetan works."
With these extraordinary observations the "Life of Issa, Best of the Sons of Men," seems to evaporate and vanish away. For if its parts exist only thus scattered, the order and structure of the work are evidently the contribution of Notovitch himself, and the "Life" as a whole is his creation. This much he admitted.
As it was, Notovitch seemed to have taken refuge from his critics in a fog of indefiniteness. In his first preface he spoke of the monastic libraries as " containing a few copies of the manuscript in question." But later it was of no use to look for the manuscript, he intimated, for there was no manuscript; and he lightly referred serious students of his supposed discovery to " verses scattered through more than one book, without any title."
This is not the method of sober scholarship.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by Akragon
It seemed to be like the Bible though with a few quirks , if this was really his story , it would be awesome.
But i read some more things on the site and it mentioned karma ... which i dont believe in (within reason ; do unto others , you would have others do unto you). Sin is sin , and your dead either way and i saw reincarnation also ... which i dont believe in.
Hmm , dont know.edit on 04/30/2011 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
If I were to live my life for a man who tells me that I should follow in his foot steps, wouldn't it be pertinent that I know the whereabouts and experiences of this man's life for the 18 years that were omitted in the Bible?