It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sceptredisle
OWS is not a protest, but a mob.
I have a great deal of sympathy for those campaigning and marching to lobby their elected officials. They are supposed to represent them and if they do not, in the words of Truman, "if they can;t take the heat, they should get out of the kitchen:".
This though, is fundamentally different to a group of people, occupying land that is not theirs and obstructing and intimidating ordinary people whi have not claimed any ability nor right to govern them and who are merely going about their workaday lives to put food on the table for their families. This is no different that a gang of schoolyard bullies trying to rough up some playground geeks in get their hands on their lunch money.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by sonnny1
Even if money were completely worthless, they'd just get paid in a different way (gold, stocks, whatever...). So protesting that the system needs to be fixed is 100% justified. Are you seriously arguing against fixing the system?
Never implied that.If money is worthless,Stocks become worthless also.IE,Crash..........Gold might be worth something,but can you eat it?You said protest the system. The Monetary system? Our Government? It starts with Government. Thats been my biggest beef with what you have said this whole time. You want to fix a system,financial,that cant be fixed,unless you make the laws to fix it. Thats common sense. Our financial mess is IRREVERSIBLY broken. If you dont see that,then my conversation with you is over.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
But I'm glad you want new laws to fix the system, it's EXACTLY what OWS wants too...glad you're on the same side
Not surprising though given the link you posted is from the NY Post, a Murdoch owned newspaper. And we know just well what Murdoch thinks about the movement. It's pretty clear why Murdoch's against the movement...he wants more $$ on the back of taxpayers:
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by xuenchen
Well, if it goes according to Cain's wishes, 84% will end up paying more taxes, and only the top 0.5% (not even the whole top 1%) will gain significant cuts
Just like any other politician, he's just reading from a script. And you have to wonder who inspired him to come up with that plan, the 84% who will end up paying more taxes, or the 0.5% who will gain significant cutsedit on 23-10-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)