It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Something remarkable occurred in President Obama's press conference on Friday (July 15). It was so astonishing that I was not sure I had heard right, and had to wait until the press conference transcript was posted on the White House website to be sure. But there it is in the sixth paragraph. Here is the quote in full:
Now, what that would require would be some shared sacrifice and a balanced approach that says we're going to make significant cuts in domestic spending. And I have already said I am willing to take down domestic spending to the lowest percentage of our overall economy since Dwight Eisenhower. [Emphasis added.]
I, at least, have never heard this before, but "before" is not really important; President Obama has said it now. Republican negotiators, the Tea Party, indeed the country must hold him to it. This is the entire game, the entire problem, in spending and therefore the debt ceiling question.
Spending has exploded to 25+% of GDP on president Obama's watch, six percentage points above where it "should" be at 19% of GDP! If the president is willing to take spending back to 19% of GDP, which is the level implied by the Eisenhower reference, the game is won.
Originally posted by wantsome
"What is that?" It's called the 14th ammendment to the constitution. It gives the president the power to raise the debt limit without congress.
Originally posted by Jakes51
Armageddon? Oh, please? Way to pile on the suspense and drama? Are you sure the President is not moonlighting as an entertainer? I can say one thing for certain, that if this cycle of spending more than what comes in continues we will face economic Armageddon. At this very moment in the nation's history, the legislature has the the opportunity to reign in excessive government and hideous spending. For all practical purposes we are already insolvent, but have been borrowing to make up the deference.
Fitch may downgrade US debt unless deal reached by August
The government reached its borrowing limit of US$14.29 billion on May 16. Since then, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has employed what he calls “extraordinary measures” to continue paying the government's bills. They include borrowing from two federal employee pension funds and halting a program under which Treasury issues securities to help state and local governments meet their investment obligations.
The President is kicking and screaming because he knows his spending days are numbered, and will have to tighten the belt of government. The states are already making cuts across the board to stave off fiscal disaster, and what make the federal government any different? I saw another item in the article were it said that senators are working on a measure that gives a President the right to raise the debt limit at their beckoned call?
Obama's Doom Prediction Over Debt Ceiling
Leading senators are working on an emergency 'plan B' which would allow the President to raise the debt ceiling without Congressional approval.
What the heck is that?! He does not have the authority to raise the debt limit, and for any member of the legislature to even consider giving it to the executive branch is very troubling. I would essentially give a President another broad dictatorial power, and would usurp an essential area in the balance of power. There is more to this game than what meets the eyes, and we are seeing a crisis manufactured by the President and his supporters to increase their authority and spending powers. I say let him threaten seniors, people on public aid, pensioners, and all the vulnerable of society. His political career is on pins and needles. He can talk all high and mighty in his various speeches. However when the rubber meets the road and true leadership is needed, he throws fits and likes to play the martyr. I say spare the martyrdom spiel, and come up with proposals of your own! That is something he has not done up to this point.
As for those who would like to claim that if an agreement is not meet before the August deadline, and how it could throw off the recovery? More smoking mirrors, and folks there is no recovery. We have been treading water since 2008. This is not a recession, but a Depression with a capital "D." Eighteen thousand new jobs last month, and they call this a recovery? It is high time to get our own affairs in order instead of the affairs of the world. The opportunity to do so has presented its ugly face, and it is time for the politicians to pay the piper.edit on 18-7-2011 by Jakes51 because: (no reason given)
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
Originally posted by nakiannunaki
The US is edging closer to the first-ever debt default in its history, with President Barack Obama warning the country faces "Armageddon".
...
uk.news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
...But it’s the only data point we have on a U.S. default. Not surprisingly it shows that even temporary default is a bad idea.
P.S. Some observers believe the United States also defaulted in 1933 when it abrogated the gold clause. The United States made its payments on time in dollars, but eliminated the option to take payment in gold. For a quick overview of this and related issues, see this blog post by Catherine Rampell at the New York Times and the associated comments.