It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Or you could just fly a plane into the building at 500 miles per hour.
Some may have been made-up people, such as fabricated payroll accounts to pad expenses for defense industry firms, to syphon off money to fund black operations. Some people may have been real but already targeted for assassination for various reasons.
Originally posted by micmerci
Seriously??
That is completely insane. How about the people who were passengers on the planes that crashed into the towers? Were all their deaths faked?
So the plane was a hologram and then they fired a missile ( that must've been invisible) to cause the explosion?
Anyone pushing a theory that no planes crashed into the world trade center is not right in their head, or purposefully pushing dis-info. Move on to more interesting facts about that day.
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by jmdewey60
Please tell me that you are not buying into this theory!
I am a New Yorker. My wife survived the first attack on the towers in 1993. I have friends and family that were killed on 911 and who survived. The survivors saw planes with THEIR OWN EYES!! The list of the dead include some very real people my friend, especially real to their families. That being said I do not suppose that the story we were fed is what really happened. But this theory is way out there and baseless.
What went through was the fuel. The only solid thing I see (looking at the videos) going completely through was what looks like a big rod of depleted uranium which would have been a ballast devise to help steady the plane. I also think that was the flash when the plane first made contact with the wall. As soon as the plane decelerated, the rod would have broken free and lit up when it hit the steel.
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by jmdewey60
OK, so you are not buying his no plane theory. That is a good thing. I think the timing would have to be too precise for the leading missile thing, especially to not get picked up by any eyewitnesses. But logic says that an aluminum aircraft crashes into a steel structure should smash with debris falling to the ground. Those planes went through like a hot knife through butter. Something doesn't line up.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
A lot of witnesses did not even see the plane, so do you think they would see something smaller and faster?
Yes, as a matter of fact, I have, having been in the military and in a unit involved in developing anti-missile technology.
Have you seen an object fly at ~400-500 mph (average of 430 kn)? How many people just gaze up in the sky as they go about their day to see something, where they normally won't see it, going that fast?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by JimmyJim
So the plane was a hologram and then they fired a missile ( that must've been invisible) to cause the explosion?
There is a real plane that crashes, but other planes in the background to launch missiles.
No holograms, but cgi to cover missiles inadvertently picked up by news helicopter cameras.
A lot of witnesses did not even see the plane, so do you think they would see something smaller and faster?
edit on 28-6-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)