It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
1. The Holographic Principle
Let's remember that this is still a theory yet it's actually being tested..I can't remember where but either Fermilab or Stanford are coming to my head. I may be completely wrong but it's definitely some American physicist.
Now, the idea that we are actually 'holograms' is rather unsettling. What I picked up though from some books I've read is that it may in some way indicate that everything is pre-planned. That information about ourselves is 'stored' in the surface of the universe.
Ooo good idea for another thread haha...I can fit this snugly in.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
1. The Holographic Principle
Let's remember that this is still a theory yet it's actually being tested..I can't remember where but either Fermilab or Stanford are coming to my head. I may be completely wrong but it's definitely some American physicist.
Now, the idea that we are actually 'holograms' is rather unsettling. What I picked up though from some books I've read is that it may in some way indicate that everything is pre-planned. That information about ourselves is 'stored' in the surface of the universe.
Ooo good idea for another thread haha...I can fit this snugly in.
Its frmilab that was going to build the holometer, but dunno how far they have come with iit, which will basically prove that the universe is 2 dimensional and we all exist in a hologram.
IMO, they will succeed. As a 2D infinitesimalyl thin membrane, the length of the known universe, whether elastic or otherwise to exist will require some amount of energy, now to beef up this membrane to the 3rd dimension, integrate this energy to encompass the 3rd dimension and you end up with an absurdly large energy value, which imo will cause the universe to collapse on itself.
Sure we'll wait for your newly compiled thread on this. You do write just as well as zazzy
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
Originally posted by illuminazislayer
Nice thread ! I have a very minimal knowledge of science, but I am particularly amazed by some of the theories expressed in today's quantum physics. Many physicist are coming out with theories that nothing in this world is solid or matter does not exist. And without observer their can be no universe. I wonder what you think about it.
Matter does not exist
peaceandloveism.com...
“Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses. There is no matter.”
- Quote attributed to Albert Einstein
Yes, this is quite a bold statement, if true, that would certainly demand some sort of evidence or mathematical proof to back it up. It may seem like a paradox that the things which we can see and touch are nonexistent. However, there is an answer to this, which may be found in the bold and exciting (relatively) new science of quantum physics.
In ages past, it was believed that what we can see and touch, like a rock for instance, was the elements, in other words, matter. However, as science developed, such as chemistry, and much more recently quantum physics, it had been observed that matter seems to exist on one hand, but once one takes a deep look into the heart of the matter (no pun intended), there seems as if there is nothing.
I agree with you : matter does not really exist, what we feel with our senses when we touch a chair for example, is just highly concentrated energy : I explain ( as I said in another thread ) : take 2 magnets and try to push the north pole against the other north pole - what do you feel ? yes you feel repulsion, the nearer the stronger, and after a while the force seems to be touching like touching a wall : looks like it is touching matter !
Anyway : never forget that when you walk on the ground with your feet, you never really touch the ground ! because the electrons of the ground atoms/molecules never touch the electrons of the feet atoms/molecules.
Otherwise they would merge together and collide - no, there is a repulsion between the electrons of each sort of atoms.
So the next question is : why look for Higgs ??? not for the MATTER but for the MASS ?
what makes the mass ? photon has NO mass that is for sure. Have to look for all this also once more.edit on 13-4-2011 by Sunlionspirit because: (no reason given)
IMO, they will succeed. As a 2D infinitesimalyl thin membrane, the length of the known universe, whether elastic or otherwise to exist will require some amount of energy, now to beef up this membrane to the 3rd dimension, integrate this energy to encompass the 3rd dimension and you end up with an absurdly large energy value, which imo will cause the universe to collapse on itself.
Sure we'll wait for your newly compiled thread on this. You do write just as well as zazzy
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
reply to post by Angelic Resurrection
Wait so how many dimensions do you believe the universe has? 3?
I wouldn't be surprised if there was some way for the universe to collapse...but i'm not following what you're saying..do you mind expanding for me please
string theory is not physics, it's more like religion with a lot of math involved. Not that I have anything against religion or magic... just I think science is a whole different topic
Originally posted by BlackPoison94
Science itself is seen to be a religion to some. I however disagree that string theory is a religion...religions can't be proven correct but so far, everything is falling snugly within string theory...all previous concepts and it has predicted certain things which we have proven or will be able to.edit on 15-4-2011 by BlackPoison94 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by playswithmachines
reply to post by BlackPoison94
One more thing, Bearden predicted that if they fired 2 protons with anti parallel spin (both turning opposite ways) that they will pass right through each other, which they did just that in a lab a few years back. This contradicts many laws of classical physics
Food for thoughtedit on 18-4-2011 by playswithmachines because: Typeset