It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warbird03
reply to post by pajoly
That link looks like BS to me. It's dated Feb. 2nd and doesn't provide any sources while being listed under blog posts. The whole site has a fake feel to me.
Edit: Macman: White House officials said that, and we all know how trustworthy they are. Honestly, it doesn't make any sense for him to run for president. Hardly anybody knows him and I don't recall any ambassador winning a national election.edit on 7-2-2011 by warbird03 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IamAbeliever
This could be anything from "hey, just wanted to catch up with everyone" to briefings about some new security measures being implemented in light of all the unrest around the world. Or it could be several other things, obviously all speculation:
A. Chinese President Jintao informed Obama that his country found something on the moon and either the US go public or the Chinese will.
B. A false flag operation is about to be carried out on US soil, so let's get everyone close to the roost.
C. A false flag operation is about to be carried out on foreign soil. Let's call all ambassadors back to Washington because calling only that countries ambassador back will obviously look suspicious.
D. The Chinese have just informed us they are collecting on all that debt and the dollar is about to tank, be ready for massive rioting.
Of course none of us know what the hell these meetings are about, but I find it awfully odd that no mention of it is being made in the MSM.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by warbird03
reply to post by pajoly
That link looks like BS to me. It's dated Feb. 2nd and doesn't provide any sources while being listed under blog posts. The whole site has a fake feel to me.
Edit: Macman: White House officials said that, and we all know how trustworthy they are. Honestly, it doesn't make any sense for him to run for president. Hardly anybody knows him and I don't recall any ambassador winning a national election.edit on 7-2-2011 by warbird03 because: (no reason given)
His family is very, very wealthy. More so then Romney and anyone else who may run. He has the funds to do so and has the past to show it is the path he wants.He was the Governor of Utah. Not just ambassador.edit on 7-2-2011 by macman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by beezzer
So every single ambassador that was ever appointed by any president is a "neophyte"? Exactly how long, in YOUR opinion, does one need to be an ambassador before you stop considering them "neophytes"? That word doesn't even work by the classical definition. I think you're thinking of some other "neo-" buzzword.
And PS---Obama didn't appoint them all. Look at the dates of their confirmations. Many of them were Bush appointees.edit on 7-2-2011 by 00nunya00 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by beezzer
I have no patience for those who throw around buzzwords without *seemingly* understanding them, or those who throw out ridiculous misogynistic insults like the one in your original post about Hillary wanting to ask if her "butt looks big." Don't go randomly insulting people in a public place without expecting someone to take offense. May I suggest a little less vinegar in your diet and a little more sugar?
Originally posted by coastalite
Originally posted by exile1981
...they knew that a video conference on that scale would be intercepted by unfriendlies...
Who's to say some of these US Ambassadors and their staff won't leak the meeting's info anyway?
Originally posted by warbird03
reply to post by Colton
While I'm pretty sure whatever your point is is probably a stretch, care to explain what the significance of December 3rd is? Tried Google... 4th entry was a Dilbert comic strip.
Originally posted by SonOfTheLawOfOne
I mentioned this on another thread as well....
On the Super Bowl pre-game show on Fox yesterday, they were talking about the coming lockout in the NFL. What was said was that it is a fight between billionaires and millionaires. What was also said was that the owners (the billionaires) have been setting aside money for a while and have "plenty" to sit out the strikes. That, to me, is an indicator of sorts. If you have several owners, who are all billionaires, that have been saving money for quite some time, enough to sit out a strike in the entire NFL, THAT is telling.
Since the lockout is supposed to start in the beginning of March, and this meeting is happening this week, this doesn't look good to anyone with an iota of conspiracy blood in them.
And we wonder where all of the money has gone....
~Namasteedit on 7-2-2011 by SonOfTheLawOfOne because: (no reason given)