It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Anti-Evolution Bill in Oklahoma

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2011 @ 02:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by GBP/JPY
get informed...darwin didn't come up the thoery, his dad started it. darwin stated that the entire theory was not to be trusted if one instance of reverse order was seen...and he couldn't explain the eye.!
reverse order is found many places in muscle type . it's as if a creator has incredible order in this universe and science has given over the the fact the deeper the tech goes.
the native american i saw on a video said it well...."you guys might be descended from chimpanzies....but we are not"
they are merely our relatives. so stop being victims of the world view lies
edit on 3-2-2011 by GBP/JPY because: REFUSE TO BE A VICTIM

Get informed?

First, it wasn't his father but his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, that commented on what would be recognized today as evolution in his Zoonomia:


Would it be too bold to imagine, that in the great length of time, since the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the commencement of the history of mankind, would it be too bold to imagine, that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament, which THE GREAT FIRST CAUSE endued with animality, with the power of acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by irritations, sensations, volitions, and associations; and thus possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent activity, and of delivering down those improvements by generation to its posterity, world without end!

But Erasmus was basing his ideas on Hartley and Burnett and others, who were basing their theories on earlier work and so forth. In fact, writings describing evolutionary thought were produced by both Greek and Chinese philosophers around the fourth century BCE. Similarly, development of the theory of evolution didn't end with Darwin's work - work in genetics and other fields has been added as information becomes available and is verified.

Second, someone not being able to explain the evolution of the eye a century and a half ago isn't somehow proof that evolution is wrong. It's just the lack of an explanation. And it's a lack of explanation from 150 years ago that's since been filled.

Can you explain what you mean by reverse order?
edit on 3/2/2011 by iterationzero because: fixed ex tag



new topics
 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join