It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SEATTLE — Astronomers have now pinned down the weight of the most massive black hole known, a huge beast with the mass of 6.6 billion suns, a new study reports. This enormous mass is the heaviest ever measured for a black holeusing a direct technique, researchers said. The supermassive black hole is about 54 million light-years from Earth. While that seems far, it's actually the closest black hole of its weight class to our planet. Given its size, the hefty black hole — found at the heart of the elliptical galaxy M87 — is likely the best candidate for future studies to actually "see" a black hole for the first time ever.
Think of a black hole growth like the growth of your waistline. If you eat less calories than you burn up, your waistline gets smaller, eat more calories than you burn up, your waistline gets bigger. This analogy holds true for black holes too. They "burn up" or more correctly, dissipate matter outside the black hole via Hawking radiation. So if they aren't "feeding" or sucking any new matter in, they will shrink. If they are feeding, if it's an amount of mass greater than the mass lost through hawking radiation, they will continue to grow. I doubt there's an upper limit if there is enough material to get sucked in faster than hawking radiation is emitted.
Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
So it seems like these things just keep getting heavier and heavier, I wonder would there be a "breaking" point for them or would the weight just continue to pile up? I know other objects in the universe have their limits such as the sun and perhaps some planets? Though for a case like black holes I'm not sure, but I sure would like to know!
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Think of a black hole growth like the growth of your waistline. If you eat less calories than you burn up, your waistline gets smaller, eat more calories than you burn up, your waistline gets bigger. This analogy holds true for black holes too. They "burn up" or more correctly, dissipate matter outside the black hole via Hawking radiation. So if they aren't "feeding" or sucking any new matter in, they will shrink. If they are feeding, if it's an amount of mass greater than the mass lost through hawking radiation, they will continue to grow. I doubt there's an upper limit if there is enough material to get sucked in faster than hawking radiation is emitted.
Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
So it seems like these things just keep getting heavier and heavier, I wonder would there be a "breaking" point for them or would the weight just continue to pile up? I know other objects in the universe have their limits such as the sun and perhaps some planets? Though for a case like black holes I'm not sure, but I sure would like to know!
That's definitely a whopper!
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Think of a black hole growth like the growth of your waistline. If you eat less calories than you burn up, your waistline gets smaller, eat more calories than you burn up, your waistline gets bigger. This analogy holds true for black holes too. They "burn up" or more correctly, dissipate matter outside the black hole via Hawking radiation. So if they aren't "feeding" or sucking any new matter in, they will shrink. If they are feeding, if it's an amount of mass greater than the mass lost through hawking radiation, they will continue to grow. I doubt there's an upper limit if there is enough material to get sucked in faster than hawking radiation is emitted.
Originally posted by MystiqueAgent
So it seems like these things just keep getting heavier and heavier, I wonder would there be a "breaking" point for them or would the weight just continue to pile up? I know other objects in the universe have their limits such as the sun and perhaps some planets? Though for a case like black holes I'm not sure, but I sure would like to know!
That's definitely a whopper!
Think of a black hole growth like the growth of your waistline. If you eat less calories than you burn up, your waistline gets smaller, eat more calories than you burn up, your waistline gets bigger. This analogy holds true for black holes too. They "burn up" or more correctly, dissipate matter outside the black hole via Hawking radiation. So if they aren't "feeding" or sucking any new matter in, they will shrink. If they are feeding, if it's an amount of mass greater than the mass lost through hawking radiation, they will continue to grow. I doubt there's an upper limit if there is enough material to get sucked in faster than hawking radiation is emitted.
However, since the universe contains the cosmic microwave background radiation, in order for the black hole to dissipate, it must have a temperature greater than that of the present-day black-body radiation of the universe of 2.7 K = 2.3 × 10−4 eV. This implies that M must be less than 0.8% of the mass of the Earth.