It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by Annee
Rights are not mutually exclusive. In a nation of law, all parties have them. This gentleman has the right of free expression on his own property and the Muslims certainly have the right to practice their religion. Now the Muslim folks could go to the mosque to pray, but the gent's yard ain't going anywhere, hence in this situation, his rights should have prevailed.
This entire business, is meant to upset the order of society. It is to change the mores in how societies are governed. Fining people for yodeling is just the latest example. What do they call it when there is an organized movement to alter the fabric of society outside of the political process? Its called terrorism. This business is terrorism. When a group can force the government to restrict basic rights of expression by merely ask that those rights be restricted they have committed an act of state enabled terrorism.
The apeasment of these folks is going to cause the Western world to die a death by 1000 cuts. Small cuts indeed, but the resulting death is the same.
In case folks have not truly recognized what is actually going on here is that the Muslims are implementing an infrastructure of special rights the exercise of which will directly undermine the rights of the citizens of the nations they have immigrated to. It is happening on purpose, with full expectation of the outcomes. They are using our own freedoms and tolerance to destroy our freedom and impose their intolerance.
Originally posted by Night Star
Sorry, I didn't read through all the pages. You know what? I don't care if some muslims are offended. Too damned bad. They don't have to move to a country where everything will offend them. Same here in the States, no matter where you come from, if you decide to live here then respect the ways of the country.
I am sick and tired of seeing how some cultures who move out of their countries have everything catered to them while citizens have to change for them. It's quite alright for us to be offended though isn't it?
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by dolphinfan
Rights are not mutually exclusive. In a nation of law, all parties have them. This gentleman has the right of free expression on his own property and the Muslims certainly have the right to practice their religion. Now the Muslim folks could go to the mosque to pray, but the gent's yard ain't going anywhere, hence in this situation, his rights should have prevailed.
Newsflash: other countries aren't governed or ruled by the laws or ''rights'' of the USA.
In our own countries, we like to live by our own laws.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
reply to post by Sherlock Holmes
Newsflash back - western societies are governed by a notion of common law, law which applies to all citizens and supercedes other form of law, be those local in design or those coming out of a religious doctrine. Austria has such a system and as such this gent's rights have been violated.
This has nothing to do with US law, what so ever
Absolutely. The questions then become, are you sane &, if so, what can you do? Do you have the courage to tell your neighbours that you've had enough of this bullsh# & you want their help to stop it? If you dont have the courage to risk ostracism, maybe you dare do something alone. What can you do alone that wouldn't be spun in the media against your aims?
At some point sane people are going to have to stand up and fight against this nonsense.
Originally posted by nenothtu
You don't have the right of free expression or to practice your religion in your country (that being the two rights he mentioned)?
Why the hell did you ever let that happen?
Originally posted by skeptic_al
reply to post by dolphinfan
I find it Offensive, and I'm not religious!
It's just another one those stupid things people do when they are alone on a Mountain.
1) Hamtramck has approved the Islamic call to prayer to released five times a day over city loudspeakers and
2) Dearborn has agreed to consider making two Islamic holy days official city holidays.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by nenothtu
You don't have the right of free expression or to practice your religion in your country (that being the two rights he mentioned)?
Why the hell did you ever let that happen?
Free expression has limits.
While I can't speak with authority on Austrian legislation that surrounds this issue, here in Britain we have laws prohibiting incitement to racial and religious hatred.
I believe that the laws regarding this kind of issue are strict in Austria, due to a bit of 'guilty conscience' after WWII.
There's no need to act all high and mighty, because the USA has restrictions on free expression as well.
I'm also pretty sure that if someone spent their time in their front garden, shouting racially provocative slogans inciting racial hatred against black people, then measures would be taken to put a stop to it. Even if it was just locking the guy up in a mental institution.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
There are noise ordinance laws.... People of any religion have the ability to call police for help when people violate rules.
Its sad seeing how many people here are blinded.