It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does the NIST report withstand scrutinity from experts not under the NIST umbrella?
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by hooper
Whoops what happens if there are members of the American Society of Civil Engineers on the 911 truth petition?
does that make them more credible, or ASCE less credible??? hmm ?
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by hooper
Whoops what happens if there are members of the American Society of Civil Engineers on the 911 truth petition?
does that make them more credible, or ASCE less credible??? hmm ?
I am sure there are also members of ASCE in prison also. Doesn't mean anything.
Its what the ASCE does as a group or organization. Also, as stated above anyone is more than welcome to produce their own report.
Originally posted by hooper
Also, the NIST was really not privy to any "special information" or super secret computer technology. The construction details of the buildings were well known or knowable, the events involved aren't exactly top secret. Anyone or any group is more than welcome to run their own calculations and offer a report and none has been forthcoming to date. I think that speaks volumes.
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by hooper
Dave if you understand what the NIST report says you better have the necessary education in the related fields or I have a hard time taking you seriously. I am certain you THINK that you understand the NIST report however.
Well has the NIST report been peer reviewd across the world, the way the moonlanding has been peer reviewd, or almost any other scientific discovery/breakthrough. Its common practice. The people who looked into the NIST report I know of said it does not add up, none of it and that the approach was all wrong to begin with IE, instead of properly looking for the cause, they started with the cause and fabricated their explanation around it and the explanation does not hold up as far as I have been told. That was from a couple of professors who looked into the NIST report waaay before I approached them, because their students in related fields were of course curious to discuss something related to their field which has such world wide attention.
The way things look right now the people who believe in the OS believe in special magic and bigfoot and have a fascination for tinfoil hats.
Well a couple of professors at 2 German universieites is a small sample. What do other experts across the world say?
Rescuer 1: "It's blowin' boy. Did you hear that?"
Rescuer 2: "Keep your eye on that building, it will be coming down soon."
Rescuer 3: "The building is about to blow up. Move it back!"
"We are walking back. There's a building about to blow up. There's flame and debris coming down."
2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored..., page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com...
GZ Rescuer: ‘WTC 7 about to blow up’ ...
....Rescuer 3: "The building is about to blow up. Move it back!"
killtown.blogspot.com...
Well has the NIST report been peer reviewd across the world, the way the moonlanding has been peer reviewd, or almost any other scientific discovery/breakthrough. Its common practice.
The people who looked into the NIST report I know of said it does not add up, none of it and that the approach was all wrong to begin with IE, instead of properly looking for the cause, they started with the cause and fabricated their explanation around it and the explanation does not hold up as far as I have been told.
That was from a couple of professors who looked into the NIST report waaay before I approached them, because their students in related fields were of course curious to discuss something related to their field which has such world wide attention.
The way things look right now the people who believe in the OS believe in special magic and bigfoot and have a fascination for tinfoil hats.
Well a couple of professors at 2 German universieites is a small sample.
What do other experts across the world say?
Agencies that are not an American National anything?
Do they say the report is serious sound and scientific or do they confirm what I have been told, that it is pretty much pseudoscience?