4chan rushes to WikiLeaks

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Assange tricked the first woman into letting him stay the night and stayed with her. Probably told her loved her for a free room and sex.

Did you read the article? Women A was not tricked at all. She offered him a place to stay when she was supposed to be out of the area, she returned earlier than expected and allowed him to stay. Then they went out to dinner and had sex later on. No trick involved when she offered. Your whole "probably told her he loved her" comment is pure speculation. Even if that was a fact..so what? Has no guy ever done that before?

Then he picked up another girl who called where he was living and told the first girl he picked her up and slept with her.

Wrong again. Women B actually picked HIM up. She went after him and she got exactly what she wanted. Eventually the women called Women A who had organized the event he was at and they figured out that he had slept with them both. Again I say so what? There is no actual crime here and again I will say this is something that men have been doing since the beginning of time. In the USA we call them "players". They play the field sleep with women and never are committed to any one person. It is not a crime. No one was forced to do anything against their will.

Then they both went to the authorities to get even with him. Assange is exactly who I thought he was. An attention whore using his fake fame to curry sexual favors and money. He's a Bum.

So you admit that they are doing this out of revenge and nothing more. So what law did he break exactly? Maybe he is an attention whore, that is also not a crime. There is no proof that he uses his notoriety to gain sexual pleasure, after all Women B sought him out, but it is no secret that if you are famous you certainly have more opportunity than the Average Joe. Professional Athletes, Musicians, Comics, and even Presidents have taken advantage of that benefit for a long time now. So again I ask, where is the crime?

Anonymous is going to give the powers that be a good reason to censor the Internet and regulate speech. Way to go! Not an ounce of reason evident anywhere in that bunch. We can thank them and their kind when the Internet becomes a memory.

edit on 12/7/2010 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

edit on 12/7/2010 by Blaine91555 because: (no reason given)

This I do agree with. All of this will be used as a way to regulate the internet. As a key member in Obama's Administration once said,"never let a good crisis go to waste". However if you want to thank someone for what may happen, thank your Government. They are the ones who will take full advantage of this situation to do what they wanted to do all along.

Pardon my lack of knowledge but who is this "anon" guy?
Is he some super hacker?

If he is, where can I donate..

The 4chan crowd are not "super hackers", they carry out simple, albeit effective, attacks, they are not Gary McKinnons (or me lol).

All a DDoS is, is a bunch of inbreds flooding the targeted website with requests, stopping regular users from connecting. This has pissed off a few of us PayPal users, grrrr.

Chances are pedo bear hasn't gave them their latest installment of kiddy porn so they are having a prebuescent rant.

reply to post by backinblack


I'm Anon, and so's my wife.

reply to post by backinblack



Anon is a collective consciousness, it is not a single person but a hive mind.

pastehtml.com...

Mastercard has been taken down....

reply to post by Gakus


Stop going to /b/ and it's not really much of a problem.
2nd

reply to post by Agit8dChop


EXACTLY. Look at Roman Polansky. It took them like 30 some years to extradite and they had a million chances to get him and he actually drugged and sodomized an underage girl. Though she dropped the charges, the courts still went after him for fleeing the country.
His charges were much worse, and it wasn't just an accusation they knew he did it and still 30 some years to get him back here.

reply to post by Agit8dChop


Thank you so much for putting this info up. I'm sure Gakus has just run to another one of the (millions of) wikileaks threads to spread his lies in hopes that no one will correct him as you have done. I'm thinking about taking your article to every wikileaks thread i go to and posting it to all the people who call him a "rapist" as understood in other countries. My head wants to explode every time I read a statement like the one from the guy on this thread. These people obviously 1. have not researched the topic or 2. know what they are doing when posting crap and do it for nefarious purposes.

Anyway, thank you, thank you, for posting this info.

PayPal VP On Blocking WikiLeaks: “State Department Told Us It Was Illegal”

techcrunch.com...

It might interest you all to kno that Woman A, also known as Anna Ardin, is not only a sociopathic, man-hating femnazi lowlife (excuse the insults. I am, truly, pissed off about the whole ridiculous rape charges), but also someone who likes to hang around with CIA-sponsored cuban terrorists.

Anna Ardin (the official complainant) is often described by the media as a “leftist”. She has ties to the US-financed anti-Castro and anti-communist groups. She published her anti-Castro diatribes (see here and here) in the Swedish-language publication Revista de Asignaturas Cubanas put out by Misceláneas de Cuba. From Oslo, Professor Michael Seltzer points out that this periodical is the product of a well-financed anti-Castro organization in Sweden. He further notes that the group is connected with Union Liberal Cubana led by Carlos Alberto Montaner whose CIA ties were exposed here.

Source

Unfortunately, I don't know and remember the name of the other woman so I can give that out as well. But anyway, as I am prone to make rather harsh words against these two of the Feminist Movement's finest, I shall refrain from further comments in this post.

I do not know if he is or is not. The big answer here is that he revealed information that will forever play a role in our minds obout the dealings going on in the world events. I praise a person for doing an act to catch those who ripp you the taxpayer off. Are you people MORE WORRIED about the fact of all the information that he has given to us or are you so WORLDLY WORRIED about if he is a rapist or not. If i were you, i would concentrate on the information that assange gave to the public. That info will definately more impact your world and world events than if assange is a rapist or not. Do you understand what i am talking about? Lets not do a FOX NEWS and report a supposid rape, instead concentrate on the corruption that will ultimately effect you and your childrens children, dealing with some of the issues he gave here. Lets get our priorities straight first. EXAMPLE: a cop enters a gas station and sees a kid stealing a candy bar and the lady up front getting robbed at gunpoint, and a gentleman toward the back wearing a thong and reading a magazine. NOW, the cop is not going to worry about the thong boy, or the candy thief. I would think that the cop would get the Gun Guy first. This is what i mean, by pioritizing things first. Lets not do a FOX NEWS and report on the candy thief, who robbed the store and not the crazy mad gunman pointing guns in your face and taking your money. LETS CONCENTRATE ON THE ONES TAKING YOUR MONEY. Do we have that, clear now?

Mastercard securecode is down, affecting online card transactions now

Securetrading

MasterCard SecureCode is currently down. This means that all MasterCard and Maestro transactions cannot be processed via 3-D Secure. This is affecting all payment service providers and is not SecureTrading specific.

Originally posted by Gakus

And one of the alleged victims had no problem with what had happened, until she found out he was seeing someone else as well. And on her FB page she had a message - 7 easy steps to get revenge on an unfaithful boyfriend. And guess what was at the top of the list ----- File charges against him. Then a list of how to's.
She tried to remove this from the FB after this incident really kicked off, but people kept copies.

Sounds like Gakus spends alot of his time looking up child porn "just to make sure its there" obviously. If he hates 4chan so much why does he even bother going there? Everything he said was pointless slander and questionable concidering the "trust me ive seen child porn on there loads of times" comment or summin along those line

Looks like the Anon site has been busted, if you go there all that's showing now is a message "This Account Has Been Suspended for the following reason : Furfaggotry" Admins please excuse the last word but that is what is stating on the website.

Linky to anon

reply to post by Gakus


Are you taking the p155..? Your ad hominem attacks against Assange are everything a troll would fantasize about posting in a forum like ATS. Get a life and get a grip.

L.A.A.C.P.

Leftists Are Always Causing Problems.

Anna Ardin is a prime example of the mental lunacy of the left.

reply to post by yeebsy


I've already replied to this in another thread, but it's funny, so here it is again:

1. Furfaggotry

The condition of being a furfag, one who masturbates to pornographic drawings of half-human, half-animals. Can also refer to the typical activites of such a person.

www.urbandictionary.com...