It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
One of the early members and co-founders of the tight-knit, secretive WikiLeaks operation charged today that the website and its co-founder, Julian Assange, sold intelligence information the site had obtained.
John Young, whose name was listed as the public face of WikiLeaks in the site's original domain registration, also alleged that the website is a lucrative business.
Young said he left the site in 2007 due to concerns over its finances and that WikiLeaks was engaged in the selling of documents.
Young was speaking today to WND senior reporter Aaron Klein on Klein's radio prog
Originally posted by belial259
To me this all seems like classic COINTELPRO in action. The sexual smear campaigns, the attacks using former staff and now going on about his funding.
They're doing anything they can to try and discredit Assange but it's just showing the public how they operate and how petty the people that rule our countries really are.
Originally posted by belial259
To me this all seems like classic COINTELPRO in action. The sexual smear campaigns, the attacks using former staff and now going on about his funding.
They're doing anything they can to try and discredit Assange but it's just showing the public how they operate and how petty the people that rule our countries really are.
Originally posted by mobiusmale
Assange is a meglomaniacal pervert with no morals or scruples...who has been out to make himself both rich and famous, the rest of the world be damned.
Young is a 74-year-old Manhattan-based architect who publishes a document-leaking website of his own called Cryptome.org that predates Wikileaks by over a decade. Cryptome famously posted online a review of security measures at the Democratic National Convention, it released documents that disclosed the names of alleged U.K. spies and it also published leaked internal documents about police requests inside Microsoft.
Originally posted by Pyros
This makes perfect sense to me. Does anyone have any idea how much money the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, and even some supposedly "friendly" nations pay for bonafide classified U.S. information?
Originally posted by DOADOA
i do not believe a damn thing they say about him, they can say his mother was a smurf and his father was batman and 80% of this dumb azz population would believe it.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by DOADOA
i do not believe a damn thing they say about him, they can say his mother was a smurf and his father was batman and 80% of this dumb azz population would believe it.
YET.....
That very same dumb a$$ public will either believe everything that's leaked as if it's the gospel truth if it paints the US in a bad light then turn right around and deny the contents of the leaks that does not paint the US in a bad light and runs contrary to internet pop-culture view of the US because Wiki is actually a CIA front.
So which is it Dumb a$$ public?
I wish them dumb A$$eS would get their story straight.
edit on 6-12-2010 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
All warfare is based on deception. — Sun Tzu
"Well, it only came up in the topic of raising $5 million the first year. That was the first red flag that I heard about. I thought that they were actually a public interest group up until then, but as soon as I heard that, I know that they were a criminal organization."
Originally posted by Pyros
This makes perfect sense to me. Does anyone have any idea how much money the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, and even some supposedly "friendly" nations pay for bonafide classified U.S. information? Spies are paid tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for this kind of information regularly. Just look at the espionage cases.
And now we have a shadowy web-based clearinghouse for "anonymously" submitted classified information, compiling huge amounts of classified data?
Who is to say that some nation state didn't approach Assange and his associates with promises of huge amounts of money, and maybe even offers of asylum and immunity if they are prosecuted, in exchange for classified data? Or maybe even bribed them with large amounts of cash to NOT publish data on their own countries, and to provide data on the sources? Seems like a pretty obvious option to me........everyone has to plan for the future........even scumbags like Assange.