It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
lol did you not see the winki after that. Consider it a poke in the ribs. lol A not serious one at that. Good grief lol
Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
reply to post by NoAngel2u
How am I beeing "contrary"?
That might be believable if their coverage was in praise of wikileaks. lol But they vilify them and paint the "wikileaks=evil" portrait. They certainly aren't discussing the dirty deeds done cheap by our officials. NO. In fact they portray them and the country as being harmed by WL.
Originally posted by smokinsinger
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
Sorry if I misinterpreted, but I think I made my point clear anyhow.
It is my belief that the mainstream media simply wouldn't cover wikileaks if it were truly damaging to the government's overall agenda. If it were, the files and the people who leaked them would simply be wiped from existence and not a word would be spoken about it on the mainstream news. As far as I can tell, the media ONLY addresses issues that are unimportant OR that further the agenda of TPTB - a NWO fascist state.
In my opinion, when it comes to the news, you only get to hear what they want you to hear and see the sides of the issue they want you to see.edit on 6-12-2010 by smokinsinger because: add
You don't need empirical proof to suspect something exists, but you do need empirical proof to prove it exists and do something about it.
Originally posted by lawlb0t
You don't need empirical proof to know something exists, you have rational evidence.
Originally posted by smokinsinger
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
Sorry if I misinterpreted, but I think I made my point clear anyhow.
It is my belief that the mainstream media simply wouldn't cover wikileaks if it were truly damaging to the government's overall agenda. If it were, the files and the people who leaked them would simply be wiped from existence and not a word would be spoken about it on the mainstream news. As far as I can tell, the media ONLY addresses issues that are unimportant OR that further the agenda of TPTB - a NWO fascist state.
In my opinion, when it comes to the news, you only get to hear what they want you to hear and see the sides of the issue they want you to see.edit on 6-12-2010 by smokinsinger because: add
Originally posted by smokinsinger
reply to post by XPLodER
Unless wikileaks comes out with something absolutely huge like the well documented government affiliation with alien / extradimensional entities or at the very least the full truth about 9/11 (my personal prediction about the contents of the 'insurance' files if the situation is genuine), I will have a hard time believing that it isn't a manufactured issue. It just fits too well into the formula for manipulation.
At the very least, if it is a genuine situation, they are going to use it to further their agenda.
Originally posted by lawlb0t
Everything on Wikileaks everyone already knew. Its just many were in denial. You don't need empirical proof to know something exists, you have rational evidence.
Edit:
By the way, I wouldn't be surprised if they built up Wikileaks 'credibility' of leaking very accurate information and than releasing documents saying North korea, Iran, Pakistan and every other enemy of the Zionists, Bankers, Western complex, etc orchestrated 911 or something else ridiculous like that.
I am supporting wikileaks, but I am just saying becareful, your/our enemies are very close.edit on 6-12-2010 by lawlb0t because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by SkurkNilsen
Stephen Hawking is crippled and unless you also have some sort of sick fetish I don't know where your going with that. I'm being absolutely 100% serious, that to me Assange looks as if he could be a pedophile. Clearly you have some ungodly obsession with this guy I mean your logo, this thread... etc. This is my personal opinion, this is what ATS was made for right? To give opinions? No matter how biased? So like I said once and I'll say again Assange to me looks like a pedophile, my opinion which has at this time no truth to the statement whatsoever. Sorry for insulting your demigod.