It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by SaturnFX
. . .
me personally speculating...and again, keep in mind this is just my thoughts which I would immediately frame as such, is that the fused cells between our species and a ape is curious. That does make me think of genetic engineering..but I will not therefore start a church up and demand schools teach my speculation as an equal truth... Hell, I flat out believe in the ancient astronauts theory, but I also deem my belief as not even remotely close to a scientific absolute. Until undeniable proof of my belief is found and agreed upon by the majority of sciences, being peer reviewed, etc...then it simply has no room in a classroom...but rather, should be simply discussed in a coffee house informally as the interesting and compelling speculation it is. . . .
For these fused cells to be an indication of genetic engineering, they would have to be beneficial in some way to modern humans. If they are not beneficial it is more likely they were the result of a genetic accident, which was able to spread because of the small number of humans (or ancestors of humans,) surviving at that time.
As I understand it, this mutation was in no way advantageous, and was most likely a reproductive disadvantage at first, before it became established.
Do you have evidence to support any advantage from the cell fusion?
Well, lets use the proper word first..its the chromosomes that are stuck together (meh, didn't think I would get into a convo about this)
Evolutionary theory says that humans evolved from an ape ancestor who had a different number of chromosomes than modern day humans. Humans have 23 pairs and apes have 24.
The theory is that at some point two ape chromosomes fused to make a single human one. Why do we think this? Because when we look at human DNA, chromosome 2 looks just like two ape chromosomes stuck together.
The issue is that the fusion is actually an unlikely occurance..as far as advantages, well...since this is one of the more significant dna differences between us and apes, then I would venture to say it may be very significant...or not, it may be a clue that does nothing overall but is a signature of a scientist so we may one day see that humans were indeed products of genetic engineering.
Its a interesting hypothesis and allows for all kinds of speculation.
The design of life
The chimpanzee and human genome projects demonstrated that the fusion did not result in loss of protein coding genes. Instead, the human locus contains approximately 150,000 additional base pairs not found in chimpanzee chromosome 12 and 13 (now also known as 2A and 2B). This is remarkable: why would a fusion result in more DNA? We would rather have expected the opposite: the fusion would have left the fused product with less DNA, since loss of DNA sequences is easily explained. The fact that humans have a unique 150 kb intervening sequence indicates it may have been deliberately planned (or designed) into the human genome. It could also be proposed that the 150 kb DNA sequence demarcating the fusion site may have served as a particular kind of VIGE, an adaptor sequence for bringing the chromosomes together and facilitating the fusion in humans.
Originally posted by Kailassa
Oops, thanks for pointing out my mistake. I was half asleep writing that post.
Btw, a son of mine has 49/49 chromosomes.
But yes, most humans have 46.
I don't believe in alien intervention, but it would be wonderfully thrilling to be proven wrong.
The only root site I could find claiming a possible advantage from the fusion was this creationist paper which makes claims of a large number of added chromosomes on chromosome 2,
If aliens did it then they could have manipulated any number of chromosomes, but I don't see the need to bring them in as an explanation.
.
Chirstians can be just as guilty as non-christians of sin.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by Kailassa
Btw, a son of mine has 49/49 chromosomes.
But yes, most humans have 46.
It is my understanding that humans have 46 (23 pairs rather). 49 makes no sense...pretty sure that makes him...not human, however, I will let someone more studied in biology answer that one. But, check to see if the milkman is actually an alien...if he is, time to talk to wifey
The only root site I could find claiming a possible advantage from the fusion was this creationist paper which makes claims of a large number of added chromosomes on chromosome 2,
Your getting stuck on the advantages thing...mutations happen, sometimes they are great (wings, fingers,lazers, etc), sometimes they are disasterous and short lived (mother nature: I put your heart outside your body. ha.) and sometimes ultimately inconsequencial ( Wisdom teeth rule).
If aliens did it then they could have manipulated any number of chromosomes, but I don't see the need to bring them in as an explanation.
Actually, if you desire to study the subject more, I will say the subject itself is really fascinating..it is all hypotheticals in regards to the current science...and well, one hypothesis is as good as another
I am favoring ET fiddling around with DNA until there is a bit of evidence...then I will begrudingly drop that line of thinking..in my opinion, that makes more sense, but again, I fully admit that is my fantasy/belief jading my judgement.
Originally posted by Azp420
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Creationism is a sign of both insanity and outsanity. Haha playing around with pre-fixes here but seriously I think those that argue against creationism are both ignorant and arrogant. Things cannot evolve by themselves without an outside force bringing about that "change".
You mention ignorance but fail to realise that the nature of randomness means no outside force is required.
I am not a big fan of any mainstream religion because they tend to beat around the bush without giving solid answers to burning questions, but when it comes to choosing between religion and science I will always choose religion.
Interesting. When choosing between stories and provable facts, I opt for facts.
When science stops hiding everything under the pretense of "national security" this and "national security" that and most importantly stop acting like god by doing dangerous experiments that could have terrible ramifications on our planet, THEN I might give science some credit.
You seem to be confusing science with the US government.
Originally posted by paxnatus
A reply to Jobeycool
.
Chirstians can be just as guilty as non-christians of sin.
Whoa, I think you are miss speaking yourself. The truth is we are ALL sinners! Believers and non-believers. We were all born into sin and by virtue of the flesh suit we wear that makes everyone of us sinners every single day.
I am of the opinion that Christians realize how truly bad they are, meaning how evil we have the capability of being. For this reason we realize how much we need a Savior. A glorious free gift we were all (all people on the planet) given when Jesus died for us. He died to save us from ourselves.
To the ones who condemn us for our beliefs.
Many look to and condemn Christians for screwing up and not being perfect or thinking they are "Holier than thou". i say stop looking at other people for your example on how to live a Christ like life. People will always let you down and always disappoint. If you want an example of how a Christian, and I mean a true Christian should live, then there is only one you should look to and His name is Christ Jesus. He was the only perfect man ever to walk the earth. All will fall short of the Glory of God. That means believers and non believers, everyone.
Kindly,
Paxedit on 6-12-2010 by paxnatus because: quote was incorrect
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
There is a reason mainsteam science has become static over the last 20-30 years. Its become more dogmatic than the church they love to ridicule. Its called scientology; the religion of science. Ron Hubbard and Jack Parsons founded this "church" of idiocy which resembles luciferianism, aka satanism in disguise!
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I am absolutely not confusing anything with anything. It is a fact science has been polluted with masons and nazis everywhere. First of all they run government and second the national security BS is well documented on many alternative websites, books, magazines, etc.
There is a reason mainsteam science has become static over the last 20-30 years. Its become more dogmatic than the church they love to ridicule. Its called scientology; the religion of science. Ron Hubbard and Jack Parsons founded this "church" of idiocy which resembles luciferianism, aka satanism in disguise!
Don't lecture me on "creationism" versus "evolution" because I can cut through the BS like a hot knife through butter......
Originally posted by oozyism
I will repeat:
Atheism should be regarded as insanity, because it FITS the description and definition of insanity
Anyone would like to argue otherwise??
sane /seɪn/ Show Spelled
[seyn] Show IPA
–adjective, san·er, san·est.
1. free from mental derangement; having a sound, healthy mind: a sane person.
2. having or showing reason, sound judgment, or good sense: sane advice.
3. sound; healthy.