Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

reply to post by recycled


Think that there is 1 person or 1 family or 1 organization running things is why we get lost so much. Its a Brotherhood.

reply to post by Dr Cosma


Do you have a link to "the family"?

I would love to read about this.
Cults are notorious for being an off-shoot of the several worldwide intelligence agencies.

Man.....

Boon, I am with you.
I was supportive of wikileaks at first, but the minute I heard Assange comment on 9/11, I knew that he was bought and paid for by some intelligence agency.

I don't see the need for apologizing for being fooled.
Heck, the rest of the world has been fooled, as had I.

This is an excellent thread that has opened my mind up to sooooo many possibilities.

I cant seem to find the site I was on last night.
But here is a blog that covers something along those lines.
Im still searching more stuff.
Heres the link;

maguidhir.blogspot.com...

reply to post by Dr Cosma


Thanks for the link!!

I am checking it out now.

One thing that I noticed about Assange...
I mean. It is kind of trite, but it made me question him that much more.

His accent is not at all Australian. He speaks the Queen's English, in my humble opinion.

I could be totally wrong. Anyone from Oz, let me know.

Edit to add:
Here is another link to Assange and "the family".
It is pretty well researched, but the author is obviously very biased, ON THE SIDE of Assange.

Originally posted by Dr Cosma
I cant seem to find the site I was on last night.
But here is a blog that covers something along those lines.
Im still searching more stuff.
Heres the link;

maguidhir.blogspot.com...

good link bro
here's another one

That father was a member of a cult, called The Family, run by a Anne-Hamilton Byrne. Anne-Hamilton Byrne ran her ‘child-kidnapping cult’ on the outskirts of Melbourne.

“Byrne dyed the stolen children’s hair blonde and fed them '___'.” (Julian Assange of WikiLeaks: Destroyer of Worlds)

“The San­ti­nike­tan Park Asso­ci­a­tion of Anne Hamilton-Byrne con­di­tioned chil­dren with drugs, sen­sory depri­va­tion, sleep depri­va­tion, tor­ture and rit­ual sex­ual abuse in order to pro­duce sub­jects who bent to the will of the group’s leader.” (Wiki of the Damned)

“Assange claims that Aus­tralian intel­li­gence has advised him, and there is an appar­ent link between Aus­tralian intel­li­gence and the cult.” (Wiki of the Damned)

www.gather.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint


Hahahaha...

I had the same link posted in my edit.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, had moved 37 times by the time he reached his 14th birthday. His mother didn’t enroll him in the local schools because, as Raffi Khatchadourian wrote in a New Yorker profile, she feared “that formal education would inculcate an unhealthy respect for authority.”

www.nytimes.com...

hmmm. moved 37 times before 14.
no school cuz it taught respect for authority.
Kinda reminds me of the mind control techniques
of the MK-ULTRA project.

and most of the free world consider
this guy to be their savior ???

I say hogwash !!!

he is an intelligence asset working
for the Occult NWO.

He's a prime candidate due to his past
upbringing.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Well the rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper, I mean if this aint got conspiracy written all over it, then I dont know what has!
Good links there guys
It gets stranger.

Originally posted by Dr Cosma
Well the rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper, I mean if this aint got conspiracy written all over it, then I dont know what has!

can you say
"Manchurian Candidate"
for the NWO ???

Originally posted by Josephus23
Hahahaha...
I had the same link posted in my edit.

oops, sorry bro
my apologies
didn't see it
first time

reply to post by boondock-saint


Julien was adopted into a cult and Webster Tarpley has called it a MK ultra op.

MK-Ultra Minion Assange of Wikileaks Targets CIA Enemies' List with New Document Dump

tarpley.net...
______beforeitsnews/story/297/583/Webster_Tarpley:_Julian_Assange_is_MK_Ultra_operative.html

reply to post by boondock-saint


Very possibly so, why not eh?
All the dots seem to be connecting and pointing towards that direction.

reply to post by Danbones


Does Webster Tarplay have any credibility?

I got the impression from other articles he's written that the guy is bat# crazy.

reply to post by unityemissions


prove that please?
I think he has more credibility than you do

coments like that with out sourcing is just bat* crazy

reply to post by Josephus23


There are many Australians, those home schooled or privately educated speak proper English here. My children are born in Australia and don't have the typical Aussie accent either.

reply to post by bluemirage5


Thanks for the reply.

As I said, it was at best a.... hummmmm....
tepid argument.
Maybe that would be better verbiage in this debate?

It does however add to the idea that Assange could be the product of a cult, but obviously one with worthwhile home schooling.

It was simply something that I noticed.
And I am an American.
So, I thank an Ozlander for taking the time to respond.

Assange is not who he is trying to make himself look to be. His comments on 9/11 cement this for me.

I cannot believe that someone who is "dedicated" to open source intelligence would not just diminish the debate concerning 9/11, but go as far as to ridicule anyone who thinks that it should be investigated properly.

His focus is completely in tow with Israel's party line.

I do not think that he is so much a CIA asset, as he is a Mossad asset.

All of his actions take the focus off of what is important and refocuses American attention on what is not important, namely Iran.
His leaks lack any worthwhile punching power and they all seem to implicate Iran.

Iran is not a danger to America. They are not so stupid as to want to develop nuclear weapons.

That is a war that they would lose and I feel confident that Iranians are aware of this.

reply to post by boondock-saint

That father was a member of a cult, called The Family, run by a Anne-Hamilton Byrne. Anne-Hamilton Byrne ran her ‘child-kidnapping cult’ on the outskirts of Melbourne.

“Byrne dyed the stolen children’s hair blonde and fed them '___'.” (Julian Assange of WikiLeaks: Destroyer of Worlds)

Boon, Julian was still in Qld while Byrne was taking in kids as far as I have checked on the dates..
Or do you have proof Julian was one of these adopted kids??

I haven't seen anyone post any yet...

reply to post by backinblack


I would take the time to check out the website if I were you.

The blog that this was taken from is very pro-Assange.

The blogger was trying to mock people that were against Assange.
That is why the comment was over the top, but yet it is still a legit comment from a book about "the family".
This was not a comment that was in specific reference to Assange.

I have to totally agree with Boon on his take on your comments in his thread.

You do seem to be very adamant about derailing it.

Every comment that you have made, save one or two, is critical of the OP, but yet the criticisms are unsubstantiated.

I can understand asking questions and the whole "Socratic Method" approach, but I would think that 45 pages into the thread that you would see that you seem to be the only person approaching his thread in this manner.

If you want to take this from a pro-Assange angle, then I look forward to your comments, but I would ask that you give us something to work with.

Being critical of a webpage that you have very obviously not taken the time to read diminishes the validity of your own criticisms.
In my very humble opinion that is.

reply to post by Josephus23


What a stupid post...
Maybe you need to read my posts a little better..
I have only questioned the connections Boon is making, not all the facts..
MANY others have also questioned but lost simply can't be bothered anymore..

I did look into the cult angle..
The years do NOT match..
Julian was still in Queensland..I did not get that from a blog..
I checked multiple sites to get a timeline for Julian and the cult..

reply to post by backinblack


Any timelines are impossible to substantiate about Assange and his youth.

I never said anything that you posted was "stupid".

I merely said that you seem to be the only person who seems adamant about making some sort of statement, but I do not know what that statement is.

I do apologize if you took offense to my comment, but I would think that what I posted is self-evident.
If you have links to post that would validate your timeline then post them.

But simply making broad statements without giving any sources is no different than what you are apparently being critical of.
The only other comments that I see that are critical of Boon's OP is his writing style.