It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by oozyism
Well.. now you are letting your stubbornness and ignorance show.
You know damn well it's the same. It says so. The gangsters were planning to blow up this police station
but undercover agents intervened posing as weapons dealers, it's exactly the same. In the Muslim bomber case they were posing as bomb maker radicals. In this case as arms dealers, in other cases hit men. It is all case sensitive. Come on.. you have to realize now. They do this to whomever. It is how they work. It is effective and it stops crime it stops innocent deaths. This is the exact same. Anyone here can see that this proves my case. If you can't you are hopeless and are letting your dedication to a criminal show.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by oozyism
Wrong-o read up on what you post. That was this attack, and he was planning it. Not the FBI. Just like your gangster case, if they hadn't posed as the weapon dealers they may have gone to someone with the real deal. Just like the kid could have gone to a real deal bomb maker had they not gotten involved. The kid had been considering stuff like this since he was 15, that's four years. The FBI only got involved around june or july when he actually became a threat. He had years to turn his way of life around.edit on 30-11-2010 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
reply to oozyism
...hey, oozy - has this young man's family made a statement?... i'd be interested in hearing their side... if you've got a link - hook me up, please...
So far, Mohamud's family has not spoken publicly about the arrest, but some in the close-knit Somali community in Portland have come forward. The suspect's father is described as an active member of the community and his mother as someone who does not wear a hijab, signifying a family life that was tolerant and progressive. "This is a family everyone looks up to," a 24-year-old immigrant identified only as "Ali" told the Oregonian. "They are the most educated modern Somalis. I'll bet this is their worst nightmare, too."
What's missing from all of these celebrations is an iota of questioning or skepticism. All of the information about this episode -- all of it -- comes exclusively from an FBI affidavit filed in connection with a Criminal Complaint against Mohamud. As shocking and upsetting as this may be to some, FBI claims are sometimes one-sided, unreliable and even untrue, especially when such claims -- as here -- are uncorroborated and unexamined. That's why we have what we call "trials" before assuming guilt or even before believing that we know what happened: because the government doesn't always tell the complete truth, because they often skew reality, because things often look much different once the accused is permitted to present his own facts and subject the government's claims to scrutiny. The FBI affidavit -- as well as whatever its agents are whispering into the ears of reporters -- contains only those facts the FBI chose to include, but omits the ones it chose to exclude. And even the "facts" that are included are merely assertions at this point and thus may not be facts at all.
We hear the same exact thing over and over and over from accused Terrorists -- that they are attempting to carry out plots in retaliation for past and ongoing American violence against Muslim civilians and to deter such future acts. Here we find one of the great mysteries in American political culture: that the U.S. Government dispatches its military all over the world -- invading, occupying, and bombing multiple Muslim countries -- torturing them, imprisoning them without charges, shooting them up at checkpoints, sending remote-controlled drones to explode their homes, imposing sanctions that starve hundreds of thousands of children to death -- and Americans are then baffled when some Muslims -- an amazingly small percentage -- harbor anger and vengeance toward them and want to return the violence. And here we also find the greatest myth in American political discourse: that engaging in all of that military aggression somehow constitutes Staying Safe and combating Terrorism -- rather than doing more than any single other cause to provoke, sustain and fuel Terrorism.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Ye,s but were Adam and Eve actively trying to leave the garden (the USA) to head to the Middle East to find an apple tree to eat from?
Originally posted by oozyism
What if you give a while skin head a C4 and planning to bomb a black gathering?
Why doesn't the FBI do that>?
Why are they focusing only on Muslims?
Isn't that prejudice?
Isn't that bigotry?
Isn't that intentionally spread hate towards Muslims?
Hey, why not give a gangster a C4, and give him a plan to blow up the police station?