It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BluePillOrRedPill
Your comment has nothing to do with your title.......
Originally posted by Alfie1
Doesn't the current wikileaks furore prove at least two things ?
(a) The US administration is not actually very good at keeping secrets.
(b) Any ideas of men in black going around silencing people by threats or murder is melodramatic nonsense.edit on 30-11-2010 by Alfie1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by ypperst
Whatever the degree of secrecy ; the point is that the US administration very much didn't want the information disclosed but was powerless to prevent it.
I expect as a result to see less about how the the perps have been able to silence anyone with information about 9/11 in the future.
Originally posted by ypperst
reply to post by Alfie1
Well, I mean, don't you think they could prevent it? I find it very weird that they didn't shut it down? They know who Julian Assange is. So why not take any action against him?
But ok, if Julian Assange isen't the only one having all those documents (wich I believe) then yes, it would be hard to prevent SOME of the documents if others also had these documents. But the could atleast try shut it down, or is that just me?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Doesn't the current wikileaks furore prove at least two things ?
(a) The US administration is not actually very good at keeping secrets.
(b) Any ideas of men in black going around silencing people by threats or murder is melodramatic nonsense.edit on 30-11-2010 by Alfie1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Doesn't the current wikileaks furore prove at least two things ?
(a) The US administration is not actually very good at keeping secrets.
(b) Any ideas of men in black going around silencing people by threats or murder is melodramatic nonsense.edit on 30-11-2010 by Alfie1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by ypperst
Whatever the degree of secrecy ; the point is that the US administration very much didn't want the information disclosed but was powerless to prevent it.
I expect as a result to see less about how the the perps have been able to silence anyone with information about 9/11 in the future.
Originally posted by ypperst
reply to post by Alfie1
Well, I mean, don't you think they could prevent it? I find it very weird that they didn't shut it down? They know who Julian Assange is. So why not take any action against him?
But ok, if Julian Assange isen't the only one having all those documents (wich I believe) then yes, it would be hard to prevent SOME of the documents if others also had these documents. But the could atleast try shut it down, or is that just me?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Doesn't the current wikileaks furore prove at least two things ?
(a) The US administration is not actually very good at keeping secrets.
(b) Any ideas of men in black going around silencing people by threats or murder is melodramatic nonsense.edit on 30-11-2010 by Alfie1 because: (no reason given)