It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DHS: Opt-Out of Naked Scan = "Domestic Extremist"

page: 3
119
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Not surprising at all. These new world order scum classify you as a terrorist if you're a Ron Paul supporter, want to End the Federal Reserve, are a gun owner or returning veteran. If you have any type of a brain to figure out that our government is working for the implementation of the new world order and is destroying our country then you are on a "list". That's okay though, every day our numbers grow and their evil becomes more out in the open. We will win in the end and bring out the Tesla zero point energy and everything else they have hidden from humanity. Keep spreading the truth even more than you have been!



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 05:27 PM
link   
how about in canuckistan where they're to cheap and corrupt to even afford scanners, your only option are pat-downs.

america has 2 choices, let some pervert look at your package, or let his other pervet partner grope you.

there's a 3rd choice, refuse both options.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
reply to post by andrewh7
 




Well then I am a domestic extremist, just like George Washington and pals. I refuse to "assume the position" or jump through hoops at the whim of DHS. I refuse to turn my head and cough just to get on a damned airplane. I refuse to be a good obedient party member.

While I'm saying all this I'd like to know why Boehner gets to bypass security when he flies commercially. It's true you know. I didn't make that up.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   
Its funny how the words "patriot" and "terrorist" can so easily be interchanged...

It is simply a consequence of perspective...



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by randomname


there's a 3rd choice, refuse both options.


There is a 4th option: Take the pat down and talk dirty to the screener, making them as uncomfortable as possible.

Do it enough and maybe the screeners will join in the protests.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   
CFP, and their partners at homelandsecurity.us, have yet to provide corroboration for this story I see. 3 pages of supposition, speculation, and reaction, and not a shred of evidence.

I want that damned memo. I'll be sending FOIA requests for it tomorrow. Things like this take leg work people. I won't be getting mud on my face for this one.
edit on 24-11-2010 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 06:27 PM
link   
reply to post by andrewh7
 


Here's my thoughts on this whole conundrum hullabaloo. If the scanner gets rids of the conveyer belt and taking your shoes off at the airport and all that horse crap then I'm for it, otherwise go to hell if that's not your plan TSA.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 06:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Internet Explorer
reply to post by romanmel
 

He has every right to be cautious, especially with a story of this magnitude

I would agree infact the more paranoid side asks:" how much of this is direct manipulation?Somebody mentioned ifan incident occurs while scanners are down=big win for tptb.They'vealso flushed out their lists with a fresh batch of domestic "WHINGERS" as that one poster said...

Silly Americans things have changed.while you were out complaining about Sarah and Bristol Palin and the possibility of nonexistent documents..Soon well have a real two party "party" the "redlist party" and the "bluelist party '. Seeya' around the crematoria.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by projectvxn
 


I am with you 110%.

We need that PDF.
Nothing on Infowars yet.
I have sent emails to my friends to try to gather as much intel as they can as they fly.

I also asked to record audio and video as they go through the security checkpoints.

Continued Violations of the Constitution for our "Security" Cannot be allowed to stand.

We should never be willing to trade liberty for security. If the problem is extreem islam, then do as we did in WWII to the germans, break their will to fight.

As an old spec ops vet I knew said: "Kill'em All Let God Sort it Out"



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by eNumbra

Originally posted by randomname


there's a 3rd choice, refuse both options.


There is a 4th option: Take the pat down and talk dirty to the screener, making them as uncomfortable as possible.

Do it enough and maybe the screeners will join in the protests.




alittle to the left
"Oh yeah..mmmm make me your "little terrorist".

edit on 24-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 07:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erasurehead
I fear the TSA and DHS more than any terrorists. The government is out of control. They want us to all submit to their will and be good little compliant sheep.

If protesting against the intrusive federal government peacefully by refusing to accept the scanners and pat downs means I am a "domestic extremist" then I will wear that label with honor.



"Out of control?" From our perspective, but from theirs it is all about control. I view this as another turning of the wheel. It is a test to see how well we can endure demeaning acts by government before we rebel.

We could postulate that they are after that very fact. Does that make sense? After all, we know they have made plans for several years for such an event. Their preparations seems to be have been wisely done. So, we ask ourselves why would they do this, create this chaos?

Easy answer, they want to impose martial law based only on civil discord and on that basis alone without the need to take such actions because of some overt terrorist attack here in the states. They are pushng us to go to the streets and give them a good reason for martial law when amazingly very little has actually changed to bring it on!

The big question is WHY? There are suspicions, of course, of what is coming down on us, but most people don't want to hear them let alone consider them.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 07:47 PM
link   
Reply to: eNumbra & 46ACE

Or you could flip them a quarter and say: "I've had better." Be prepared to take a beat down though. I have a feeling they probably leave their sense of humor at home.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 07:52 PM
link   
I love this, we're so close to just bringing back the Alien and Sedition Acts. Then it's game on.


MBF

posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 08:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by projectvxn

I want that damned memo. I'll be sending FOIA requests for it tomorrow. Things like this take leg work people. I won't be getting mud on my face for this one.
edit on 24-11-2010 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)


Good luck!!! Last time I filed one of them to get a copy of the report of an investigation that I had the Office if Inspector General do, they sent me LESS than I sent them, By the time they got through deleting the mans name and what I was accusing him of, and as many as 7 deleted pages straight, there was NOTHING there. They sent me a bill, do you think I paid it? I was told they could not substantiate any of my claims. Hell, all I had to do was pick up a news paper to see it.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by 46ACE

Originally posted by eNumbra

Originally posted by randomname


there's a 3rd choice, refuse both options.


There is a 4th option: Take the pat down and talk dirty to the screener, making them as uncomfortable as possible.

Do it enough and maybe the screeners will join in the protests.




alittle to the left
"Oh yeah..mmmm make me your "little terrorist".

edit on 24-11-2010 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)


Yeah right, as fun as it would be to engage in homoerotic foreplay with a TSA Officer, one dirty line and we would be accused of sexual assault.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by BenIndaSun


Yeah right, as fun as it would be to engage in homoerotic foreplay with a TSA Officer, one dirty line and we would be accused of sexual assault.


A sane judge, a good lawyer and a well reasoned jury; hard though they may all be to find in this country would be hard pressed to convict someone of harassment/assault when the "victim" is doing the fondling.
edit on 11/24/2010 by eNumbra because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:35 PM
link   
reply to post by andrewh7
 


We learned earlier that Obama named a bunch of American political groups "domestic terrorists." That includes advocates for the constitution, Iraqi Vets, pro-life activists, third party voters, and run right advocates. The people objecting to the sexual molestation are expressing concern for the fourth amendment. They are domestic terrorists according to dear reader. He has the power to kill terrorists or lock them up w/o a trial.

When we put leftists (fascists and socialists which are in both parties but the majority in the Democrat Party) in power they are going to see the constitution as something to defeat - as the enemy of progress. To create a Marxist Utopia, they have to violate demolish the constitution. The constitution forbids violating the rights of the individual for the interest of a collective as determined by the politically correct annointed. It limits the power of the government and protects property rights. It requires equal treatment under the law, no matter your race, political ideology or social belief structure. It names your body belonging to you and your medical decisions between yourself and your doctor. And so much more. This all stands in the way of leftist "progress."



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:42 PM
link   
reply to post by SWCCFAN
 


SWCCFAN: Why is your flag inverted? We're not to that point yet. I believe there are plenty of patriots left in this great nation! The results of the recent election show that! If your name means what I think it means, I send a big HOOYAH and thank you your way! But don't give up the "fight" yet!



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by tjack
 


"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson

They're not just terrorists, they're tyrants!

I know things seem bad now, but I'm not looking forward to whatever's next in their master plan. I have a feeling we're going downhill from here.



posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ncb79
reply to post by SWCCFAN
 


SWCCFAN: Why is your flag inverted? We're not to that point yet. I believe there are plenty of patriots left in this great nation! The results of the recent election show that! If your name means what I think it means, I send a big HOOYAH and thank you your way! But don't give up the "fight" yet!



United States Code Title 4 Chapter 1 — The Flag §8. Respect for flag: The flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.


We are a nation in dire distress!

Our corrupt Federal Government has resoted to total tyranny. Give up most of your God given; Constituanly Guarenteed rights to travel through the airport. Not Me!



I will keep my rights and defend them until death if need be.

I have served under this flag and I am ashamed of what this republic has become.

This is all our fault.

We The People have become weak and passive.

Have we not learned from History?

What did Hitler do?

Notice any simularites?

That is why I fly my flag union down!

Google: operation distress flag



new topics

top topics



 
119
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join