It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't think we can be entirely happy seeing such misery around us. Unless you live in a pod. But then there is a chance... there is something to do. Nowadays what does it mean to be on the streets? To demonstrate? You swindle yourself. Anyway, that's not the way any more.
We don't pick up weapons to kill people to start the revolution. The revolution is really easy to do these days. What's the system? The system is built on the power of the banks. So it must be destroyed through the banks. "This means that the three million people with their placards on the streets, they go to the bank and they withdraw their money and the banks collapse. Three million, 10 million people, and the banks collapse and there is no real threat. A real revolution. "We must go to the bank. In this case there would be a real revolution. It's not complicated; instead of going on the streets and driving kilometres by car you simply go to the bank in your country and withdraw your money, and if there are a lot of people withdrawing their money the system collapses. No weapons, no blood, or anything like that." He concludes: "It's not complicated and in this case they will listen to us in a different way. Trade unions? Sometimes we should propose ideas to them."
Originally posted by SlyFox_79
To those that are worried about crime...
One must sacrifice to get what one wants.
I also read that they suggest putting your money in your local banks which could work maybe.... but, and I'm not sure, don't all the big banks own the little banks in some way by now?edit on 21-11-2010 by SlyFox_79 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Dr Cosma
Now you have the whole population with hard cash in their homes.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Dr Cosma
Now you have the whole population with hard cash in their homes.
Nope, cuz only 1 in 10 who go to the bank
to withdraw will get all their money.
Originally posted by SlyFox_79
I also read that they suggest putting your money in your local banks which could work maybe.... but, and I'm not sure, don't all the big banks own the little banks in some way by now?
Originally posted by spacedonk
Exactly my point. In reality it would only take 10 to 20% of the population to withdraw their money for the system to absolutely, irretrievably collapse. There just isn't the money supply to pay out all the money held in the worlds banks - let alone that most savings deposits have been lent out by the bank to make money and they couldn't raise the money to pay out the deposits they have on account. there would be banking collapse after banking collapse after banking collapse.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
you have to realize, these banking wizards are very
intelligent. If they can stop this bank run in any way,
they absolutely will.
I am gonna predict a very big false flag event
before Dec. 7 as their counter chess move.
I'd bet the bank on it !!!! lol
Originally posted by yabbadabbadoooooo
Revolutions never begin until one person is willing to take the risk of being publicly beheaded by authorities or supposedly crucified on a cross