It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Your statement shows me that you ahve zero training on workplace behavior, or you are ignoring it for some phoney spectacle here.
Did i say eye contact? nope. Way to inject your own words. Keep up the dishonesty. It makes you look good.
i don't look at anyone too long
Originally posted by akaykaykay
reply to post by Gnarly
A cop must have a reason to search you. Not even an officer has the right to search everyone that is driving in his jurisdiction.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by akaykaykay
reply to post by Gnarly
A cop must have a reason to search you. Not even an officer has the right to search everyone that is driving in his jurisdiction.
Yeah, and if you fly, the reason to search you is to ensure your carrying something you shouldn't be, don't like that then don't fly! Easy!
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by akaykaykay
reply to post by Gnarly
A cop must have a reason to search you. Not even an officer has the right to search everyone that is driving in his jurisdiction.
Yeah, and if you fly, the reason to search you is to ensure your carrying something you shouldn't be, don't like that then don't fly! Easy!
You deliberately misunderstand the quote. "Reason" in this context means "probable cause". The mere act of flying or attempting is NOT "probable cause" to suspect that an individual is "carrying something they shouldn't be", any more than the mere act of driving is probable cause to suspect that the driver is hauling drugs or weapons.
They are just TRYING to set the conversation to imply that the mere act of boarding plane is reason to suspect criminal activity, and therefore justify a search of anyone attempting to board.
YOU would allow that, we would not. Pretty simple.
Originally posted by akaykaykay
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. "Deliberately misunderstanging" is the perfect way to put it!
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
Haha, what?
I have been "owned" how old are you ?
Please show me the proof that sexual contact occured in the video the OP linked?
You do realise you can be patted down in the genital regions in a non-sexual manner? or is that a principle you find a little hard to understand ?
I could pat you down in your groin region, doesn't mean I'm doing so in a sexual manner does it?
For someone with all this "training" you seem to lack a basic understanding of legal protocols.
edit on 23/11/10 by Death_Kron because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
And now you are going to stalk me in this thread and quote everything i say, using pedantic feats to twist meaning in to words that is just not there.
Sure, throw a peanut at me. A police officer may or may not address it, if i chose to pursue it. It is assault, yes. Just like blowing bubbles at a cop is assault.
, oh my lord....
Of course throwing a peanut at someones head is assault, just like blowing bubbles at a police officer, my friend you do not understand the true meaning of "assault" and lets hope you don't because if you find a peanut being thrown at your head offensive then God help what you'll do if someone does actually assault you.
Claim culture and do-gooder springs to mind,
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Your statement shows me that you ahve zero training on workplace behavior, or you are ignoring it for some phoney spectacle here.
Did i say eye contact? nope. Way to inject your own words. Keep up the dishonesty. It makes you look good.
Ermmm is
i don't look at anyone too long
not eye contact?
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by akaykaykay
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. "Deliberately misunderstanging" is the perfect way to put it!
You're welcome.
There appears to be a LOT of that sort of thing going on in this thread, in support of an agenda.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
I'm sorry but where abouts in the video can you see the little boys penis being touched by the TSA employee? I must have missed that?
Also, a pat on the back is not sexual abuse, please stop over dramatizing.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Given your propensity for deliberately misunderstanding, I can only assume you are deliberately not seeing. There is a career for you in journalism, you know.
Originally posted by zero1020
And so it begins. I knew the NWO was starting with the Patriot Act but now they are stepping it up. If they make guns illegal I wonder if the people will revolt or just give up their weapons for "security".
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Given your propensity for deliberately misunderstanding, I can only assume you are deliberately not seeing. There is a career for you in journalism, you know.