It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 2006, after years of scaremongering over the "War on Terror" (which former Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge later admitted was done to influence voters at politically sensitive times). A section (1076) was slipped into the John Warner Defense Authorization Act that granted the president the authority to deploy troops domestically during "national emergencies." In 2008, Congress attempted to take these powers away from the administration by passing legislation repealing the offending sections of the Act, but President Bush issued a signing statement when signing that legislation into law saying that his administration was not bound by it.
From that point on, the legal floodgates have been open and a stream of increasingly disturbing reports have confirmed that Posse Comitatus had been repealed and that the public is being conditioned to accept uniformed military personnel policing American civilians on the streets of America.
In September 2008, the Army Times reported that the 3rd Infantry Division's Brigade Combat Team had been reassigned to NORTHCOM to patrol the "homeland" in crowd control and civil unrest situations..
In December of 2008, the Marine Corps Air and Ground Combat Support Group dispatched uniformed troops to aid police checkpoints in California.
In September of 2009, the Army and Air Force provided assistance to the National Guard for security at the G20 in Pittsburgh.
Also in September of 2009, the Assistant Secretary of Defense in Obama's Defense Department requested authorization to deploy 379,000 troops inside the U.S.
But this issue is not merely an American one. There is currently a coordinated agenda across the Western world to harmonize these types of rubicon-crossing moves toward outright martial law across borders.
In March 2009, the Canadian military—which began a formal merger with the American military in February 2008 that would see American troops deployed on the streets of Canada and Canadian troops in America during 'national emergency'—announced that it, too was preparing special reserve units to provide for 'domestic security' during times of civil unrest. The troops are being trained in various crowd control and emergency measures, such as how to set up and maintain internment camps for Canadian citizens in the event of such things as enforced quarantines after a bioterror attack.
Also in March 2009 it was revealed that the British Army was being readied to deal with Brits should rioting break out in the UK.
What all of this case history reveals is that there is a coordinated agenda to knock down any remaining walls separating the general population of America, Canada and the UK from their own militaries. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the way the Coast Guard has quietly shifted from a federal policing agency into a self-declared branch of the military.
The FEderal Government cannot just declare a disaster area without coordinating with the State first, and I guarantee that any attempt to create a police state using military would not go over. Look at the backlash over the TSA. In addition to people calling for boycotts, State Prosecutors and Local Law Enforcement are warning TSA officals about their actions and the consequences coming from it. Even the Head of Homeland Security is telling the TSA cheif to rethink the patdowns, or as I refer to them as the grope or glow checks. Law Enforcement will not sit idly by and allow the Constitution to be flushed.
Originally posted by antar
I wonder if this has to do with placing American soldiers in Mexico to combat the war on drugs? Not the whole civil unrest part but about bringing home Infantries to work within our borders, or mexico as the rumors have it.
Originally posted by Animatrix
reply to post by wonderworld
Executive Orders arent needed. If the Govt does something thats "questionable" theyll either deny that it violates any laws OR theyll make a law to make it legal and make it retro-active.
The Govt and Military have the largest collection of the shadiest lawyers ever known and they work around the clock.
They arent really needed though because they already know how gullible the majority is. 08 was an example, when a JUNIOR Senator from Chicago was elected to fill the highest office in the US.
Now everyone thinks that well be ok that we threw the rascals out during the mid term elections.
The Rep battlecry was "smaller govt" but I have yet to hear the press mention to any of these Congressmen that
the Govt grew more under Bush than it did under the previous 3 Presidents. (He created the DHS and TSA aka the American Gestapo)
Originally posted by Animatrix
reply to post by Xcathdra
The FEderal Government cannot just declare a disaster area without coordinating with the State first, and I guarantee that any attempt to create a police state using military would not go over. Look at the backlash over the TSA. In addition to people calling for boycotts, State Prosecutors and Local Law Enforcement are warning TSA officals about their actions and the consequences coming from it. Even the Head of Homeland Security is telling the TSA cheif to rethink the patdowns, or as I refer to them as the grope or glow checks. Law Enforcement will not sit idly by and allow the Constitution to be flushed.
Oh but it has already been done and only a few short years ago. Even though Martial Law was never actually declared, at least some of the requisites were met.
Curfews- Check
Gun Confiscation- Check-This was even allowed to be done by Private Security Forces (Blackwater)
Military Presence- Check (Domestic and Foreign)
Food Distribution- Check
Citizen Relocation- Check
Road Blocks and Checkpoints- Check (No incoming or outgoing traffic allowed)
People dying in the streets- Check
Unarmed citizens gunned down by LE officers- Check
And finally, to comment on the last sentence you made.
Local Law Enforcement in complete disarray- Check (No, they didnt sit idly by, those few that didnt abandon their posts, joined in on the looting or shot and killed unarmed citizens)
All the govt did to get Americans to accept this is make claims that "Armed Gangs" controlled the streets, shooting at rescue helicopters and firemen.
No one demanded proof though and not one bullet hole in a firetruck or chopper was ever shown.
The Govt just said it happened and most people bought it
This event made them realize that most Americans would submit and are now submitting.
Hasnt anyone realized that not long after this event, the police have become more aggressive?
The police trainings model now seems to be taking on the same model that the Military use/used
in Iraq, meaning that they should treat EVERYONE as if theyre guilty because you never know what
that little old lady is hiding in her handbag, so have that TAZER ready.
Im sure you guys know the "event" im talking about but heres a hint, it was in 05
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Law Enforcement will not sit idly by and allow the Constitution to be flushed.
Originally posted by WJjeeper
reply to post by Xcathdra
All it would take is a simple strike (nuclear,biological, or chemical) on our soil and the president can declare a state of martial law. however, there are bigger figures at play than the president. the president is just the spokesman for bad news, while the Department of homeland security, the department of defense, and the council of governors are the real perpetrators.
Originally posted by WJjeeper
the fema camps- this has been a huge conspiracy theory for so long, but now the evidence is everywhere. look at all the private organizations that are classified as private correctional corporations. its crazy... the federal government can put us in a privately owned and operated prison!