It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by jfj123
Not at all. I used YOUR own post against you. That's your fault for lying.
Haha, okay sure, what ever you say.
No it's not so you didn't actually read it. I'll go ahead and repost the part I was referring to.
Wow, you really do have issues if you believe that someone touching you without your consent is assault, I suppose it's down to people like you that we have the current claim culture in todays society.
If you don't agree with having your home randomly searched, don't own a home.
Already pointed out to you that my home isn't a public place and that members of the public do not walk through it on a daily basis
so therefore I'm causing no potential for a threat. Try again...
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Ermmm the passenger is still wearing their clothes, no issue here.edit on 21/11/10 by Death_Kron because: (no reason given)
Again, here is YOUR post. "I actually never said I had a problem with peoples homes being searched would I agree with that? Nope, I wouldn't. "
I posted what the law states, not my opinion of it. If you have issues with the laws, change them.
irrelevant.
Surely that is more important then a little privacy RIGHT?
Assuming you're married, you wouldn't mind if someone walked up to your wife and said they were going to fondle her breasts and other area's. The person would be telling her ahead of time so that isn't an issue. She would still be wearing clothes so that isn't an issue. Do you think she would have a problem with that? Would you?
fondled past participle; Stroke or caress lovingly or erotically,"the dog came over to have his ears fondled",charges that he fondled a patient during an examination
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by jfj123
Again, here is YOUR post. "I actually never said I had a problem with peoples homes being searched would I agree with that? Nope, I wouldn't. "
Again, at that point I had never mentioned anything about peoples homes being searched, you implied I did when I hadn't, so who's the one lying?
I posted what the law states, not my opinion of it. If you have issues with the laws, change them.
Nope, you posted your interpretation of that law,
someone cannot be charged for assault for touching someone without their permission unless that person makes a complaint, which in my opinion and that of many others is an extremely petty thing to do.
Surely that is more important then a little privacy RIGHT?
Privacy in my own home is entirely different my my privacy if I'm in an immediate position to potentially cause danger or harm thousands of innocent people. Yes, I could be making the bombs in my house but I'm at no danger of ending anyones life apart from possibly my own,
Assuming you're married, you wouldn't mind if someone walked up to your wife and said they were going to fondle her breasts and other area's. The person would be telling her ahead of time so that isn't an issue. She would still be wearing clothes so that isn't an issue. Do you think she would have a problem with that? Would you?
There is a clear cut difference between "fondling" and a pat down search;
TSA agents do not want to "fondle" people and your mistaking the whole idea of a pat down search; they are designed to detect hidden weapons or other illegal contraband,
To compare pat down searches to sexual abuse or sit here quoting and informing me that unwanted touching can be classed as assault is shear over dramatization at it's best and a little pathetic.
I'd love to pat you on the back without your permission and see the cops reaction when you try and charge me for assault.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by jfj123
Haha, okay wise guy, I'd love to sit here and post counter quotes to your madness but I neither have the time or the inclination, your allowed to believe what you want old chap and me also, it appears we may need to agree to disagree
but your blatent over exaggeration, fear mongering and
personal interpretation of the law
Funny though, you would like to "pat me back", I guess we will see each other in court then when you present your counter sue
Originally posted by Soulshock
It's scary to think about what governments have done in the name of "safety and security", and will continue to do. It's all a smokescreen. "Terrorists" are puppets. There are some major games going on behind the scenes and this new TSA protocol is just a symptom.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by jfj123
Haha
I'd love to see how your justification of me patting you on the back would allow you to react in self defence? Going to punch me because I patted your back? I hope you have a good lawyer.
Anyways my old bean, win some lose some, I know where I stand
Originally posted by works4dhs
Originally posted by Soulshock
It's scary to think about what governments have done in the name of "safety and security", and will continue to do. It's all a smokescreen. "Terrorists" are puppets. There are some major games going on behind the scenes and this new TSA protocol is just a symptom.
for those who think 'safety and security' are overrated, research how people live in places like Mogadishu where the government system breaks down.
it would be nice to live in a world where everybody gets along, but there is always a least common denominator to ruin things for the rest of us.
the puppets are real. they are bad. they want to kill you.
TSA is trying to protect you from the puppets.
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by works4dhs
Originally posted by Soulshock
It's scary to think about what governments have done in the name of "safety and security", and will continue to do. It's all a smokescreen. "Terrorists" are puppets. There are some major games going on behind the scenes and this new TSA protocol is just a symptom.
for those who think 'safety and security' are overrated, research how people live in places like Mogadishu where the government system breaks down.
it would be nice to live in a world where everybody gets along, but there is always a least common denominator to ruin things for the rest of us.
the puppets are real. they are bad. they want to kill you.
TSA is trying to protect you from the puppets.
That's great and all except that it entails losing our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
Are you good with that?
I'm not.
Most Americans are not.
The reality is that you cannot be free AND safe. You must pick one.
I pick FREE.
Originally posted by FrancoUn-American
reply to post by Death_Kron
A knife aint ****, how many people would YOU feel you could take on with a brittle ceramic knife. Are they going to cut a hole in the cockpit door with it? No. At most a few people would get cut.