It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
Police and the AFP can now enter your home without a warrant if even the slightest hint of terrorist activity is suggested.
Originally posted by Stryker Ops
I can't believe that the Australian people would stand for this.
Originally posted by Nventual
Why do we even bother having elections? Somebody remind me?
Now all that is required is the expansion of the definition of "terrorism".
Originally posted by backinblack
Does make you wonder...
We had one of the lowest murder by shooting rates, so they took our guns...
We have NEVER had a terrorist attack, so they do this..
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by backinblack
Does make you wonder...
We had one of the lowest murder by shooting rates, so they took our guns...
We have NEVER had a terrorist attack, so they do this..
Yes we have.
Just after the first terrorism law was passed, a girl was charged and convicted of terrorism.
She had baked a cake, laced it with grass, and taken it to school to share with her class to celebrate her 14th birthday.
Now if the police had these powers then, they might have been able to break into her home and catch her cooking.
Logically, in view of this incident, the police should constantly patrol, searching for the smell of cooking, and burst into any house where baking is going on, with guns blazing.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by backinblack .
But like I said, we have NEVER had a terrorist attack here so why this?
Why do you totally ignore the Hilton hotel bombing?