It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
FREMONT, Neb. (AP) — A Nebraska city suspended its voter-approved ban on hiring or renting property to illegal immigrants, but opponents still want a federal judge to block the ordinance until all legal fights are resolved.
Groups challenging the ordinance are expected in court Wednesday, a day after the Fremont City Council voted to suspended the ban. City officials said delaying the ordinance would save the city money as it fights lawsuits filed by the American Civil Liberties Union...
Originally posted by MikeNice81
I wonder how long it will take for the ACLU to start defending drug dealer's right to live near elementary schools?
"We know very well that the drug traffickers are motivated by the demand for illegal drugs in the United States and that they are armed by the transport of weapons from the United States," Clinton said
An estimated 90% of drugs used in the US come through Mexico. A similar proportion of the weapons used by the cartels in their war in Mexico come from the US.
www.guardian.co.uk...
Originally posted by MikeNice81
However, if you cross the border at midnight you are some how exempt. It pisses me off.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
No where does it say this law only applies to one race or nationality. It applies to anyone that can not prove they are here legally. I don't see anything wrong with it. Maybe somebody can tell me.
When people stand up and ask for the law to be enforced every knee jerk group in the country wants you to sit down and shut up.
It applies to anyone that can not prove they are here legally.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
PRactice a little thought before posting. I was saying, if illegal immigrants are a protected class how long before other criminals become the same. See you read something and then made a connection that wasn't there. I never said illegal immigrants are drug dealers.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
I also understand the simple idea that you "don't do the crime if you can't do the time." If you want to come here illegaly you shouldn't expect an easy time and you should expect roadblocks to living a normal life. You should not expect to be considerred a protected class of people.
Fremont's ordinance would require employers to use a federal online system that checks whether a person is permitted to work in the U.S.
It also would require people seeking to rent property to apply for a $5 permit at City Hall. Those who said they were citizens would receive a permit and would not have to provide documents proving legal status. Those who said they weren't citizens would receive permits, but their legal status would be checked. If they're found to be in the country illegally and are unable to resolve their status, they would be forced to leave the property.
Yet, those figures are wildly overblown. When pressed by William Le Jeunesse and Maxim Lott of Fox News, a spokeswoman for BATF acknowledged that “over 90 percent of the traced firearms originated from the United States” — a very different figure. An analysis by Fox revealed that the statistic so favored by the gun grabbers referred only to a much smaller subtotal that Mexico sent to the United States and were successfully traced; it didn’t include the thousands obviously not from the United States that were not submitted to the BATF. As the Fox writers explained:
In 2007-2008, according to ATF Special Agent William Newell, Mexico submitted 11,000 guns to the ATF for tracing. Close to 6,000 were successfully traced — and of those, 90 percent — 5,114 to be exact, according to testimony in Congress by William Hoover — were found to have come from the U.S.
But in those same two years, according to the Mexican government, 29,000 guns were recovered at crime scenes.
In other words, 68 percent of the guns that were recovered were never submitted for tracing. And when you weed out the roughly 6,000 guns that could not be traced from the remaining 32 percent, it means 83 percent of the guns found at crime scenes in Mexico could not be traced to the U.S.
However even at that, yes certain criminals do need to become a protected class. You know why? Because there are just too many laws and almost everything is illegal that's why.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
If you want to come here illegaly you shouldn't expect an easy time and you should expect roadblocks to living a normal life. You should not expect to be considerred a protected class of people.
It is a felony in Mexico to enter the country illegally and you can spend years in prison. It is the same across Central and South America. However, we are not supposed to reciprocate. I find it outlandish that the ACLU says we have to protect illegals or we are discriminating. Especially when the law in question does not mention a specific race. If a Mexican or an Albanian shows up and says they are not a citizen they have to submit to the same scrutiny. That is not discrimination.
Originally posted by MikeNice81
However, after spending 5 hours sitting in military detention (in Mexico) because I left my passport in my room, They told the people I was with to go retrieve my passport.
The 90% number reported by Hoover came from a small group of weapons turned over to the U.S. for tracing, but they were by no means all of the weapons seized by Mexican authorities. A spokesman for the ATFE, Matt Allen, has now "clarified" the number and admitted that only 17% of the weapons found at crime scenes in Mexico have been traced to the U.S. Ironically, while Mexican officials have freely used the 90% number from the ATFE, they have not themselves made such a charge based on their own numbers. The truth is, they know better.
We can easily understand Mexico's reasons for preferring the 90% number to the more accurate 17%. Mexico does not want to openly discuss the many other sources of advanced weapons being used by the drug cartels. Thousands of advanced weapons and tons of military equipment are stolen from its own military and state police. Weapons are smuggled across its southern borders from Guatemala and by boats landing on its 8,000 miles of coastline, weapons that often originate in Venezuela, Colombia, and Nicaragua, or from purchases in Eastern Europe. But it is easier for a Mexican politician to blame the U.S. than to explain his own government’s failure to police its borders, its ports of entry and its military installations.
Did the Mexican ambassador mention that over 100,000 soldiers have deserted the Mexican army in the past seven years and that many of them took their weapons with them and joined the cartels?
UNITED NATIONS, June 14 -- Mexico's claim that 90% of guns enter its country from the United States was questioned at the UN on Monday. Inner City Press asked the managing director of the Small Arms Survey, Eric Berman, about what percentage of guns in Mexico come from the United States. Video here, from Minute 23:12.
Berman answered that contrary to Mexico's 80% to 90% figures, "there's a little problem in how the numbers are determined." He said the Mexican government has seized thousands of weapons, they selected a subset to send to the US... Another subset, those able to be determined by serial numbers, leads to a percentage 'from the US.' But the headline "skews the information."
Berman said they have "shared the information with the government of Mexico."