It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Grossac
Just got a hold of this one. Seems to be one of those triangles. Just started browsing this site. Pretty cool stuff as you can see a plane also.
Not sure how to embed and have no time to experiment.
The NOSS constellations consist of three visible satellites, each of which moves in a roughly geocentric orbit. The shape of the triangle formed cannot be maintained because the orbits must intersect one another when viewed from Earth's centre. Thus from time to time the satellites will even appear to be in a straight line from that point of view. All other times they form some sort of triangle, but its shape must vary continuously. I tried viewing them from above in simulation in Starry Night. It is possible to do so, but it is very difficult.
Originally posted by joey_hv
is that 3 ufos or a bigazz triangle in stealth mode???
Originally posted by Chadwickus
This could be a possible explanation:
The NOSS constellations consist of three visible satellites.
www.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by depthoffield
and somehow, i don't believe they were not seen with naked eyes....i don't think that camera was so sensitive, way beyound human limit... or , why not the witness's eyes were not fully adapted to the darkness.
by the way, 3 points always make a triangle (unless perfectly aligned, when makes a line)
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
You could be right about the naked eye visibility, or another issue in my area is light pollution obscuring good views with the naked eye.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
But the camera can definitely pick up things completely invisible to the naked eye, you can demonstrate this by pointing a remote control at the camera and pushing a button on it, the camera shows a "light" coming out of the remote but I see nothing with the naked eye.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
However, to support your point, the chances of a satellite only emitting EM radiation in that frequency where it's only visible to the camera and not the naked eye, seem pretty slim (I almost said remote, but bad pun based on my example )