It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Catalytic
I have 2 naive questions, and some outrageous speculation
Was the B2 tested at dreamland? I genuinely don’t know... If it was, do we know which hanger it was housed in? The point being, why build a new jumbo sized hangar, why not re-use the old B2 hangar for the similarly sized NGB?
Originally posted by Catalytic
Huge hangar = huge aircraft?? Why would hypersonic aircraft be huge? (For fuel demands right?) but wouldn’t a two stage system be more aerodynamically efficient? A piggy back system may require a tall hangar to allow the sub orbital craft to be craned onto the back of the bus / mothership.
Originally posted by FredT
Thanks for all the updates.
One aspect to consider is that IF the bomber is to be part of the SIOP then some missions will have to be manned. The go/no go option will for now and the foreseable future have to have a human in the loop precluding unmanned nuclear bombers
Originally posted by HatTrick
Intelgurl, do you follow reinhardt at enterprisecorruption.com?
just wondering.
Originally posted by TAGBOARD
Northrop is unquestionably one of the more recent black program prime contractors. One may speculate the effort was a USAF program (NGB), but disguised as Army-funded to throw investigators "off the scent".