It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The $2-billion question in development of a new bomber is whether a major black-world demonstration program is already underway, with Northrop Grumman as the contractor.
This hypothesis makes sense of a series of clues that have appeared since 2005. In that year, Scott Winship, program manager for Northrop Grumman’s X-47 unmanned combat aircraft system (UCAS), mentioned that the company—responding to a U.S. Air Force interest in a bigger version of the then-ongoing Joint UCAS project—had proposed an X-47C with very long endurance, a 10,000-lb.-plus weapon load and a 172-ft. wingspan, the same as a B-2. The idea was to match extreme endurance with a “deep magazine”—a large and diverse weapon load for multiple attacks on different types of target. Soon after, in the Fiscal 2007 budget, the J-UCAS program was terminated. While the Navy continued with the X-47B—now undergoing tests before a first flight in early 2010—it was reported that USAF funds were transferred into a classified program. The service also introduced a budget line-item for a Next Generation Bomber (NGB), but the program had no visible funds for Fiscal 2008-10.
During 2007, Northrop Grumman leaders hinted that the company expected to win a major restricted program. A financial report in early 2008 then disclosed a $2-billion surge in backlog at the company’s Integrated Systems division—just after Boeing and Lockheed Martin agreed to join forces on an NGB proposal.
Since that time, sources in Washington and elsewhere have reported that the company did win a demonstrator program for a large stealthy platform, and that the program has survived the budget cuts announced in April 2009.
A possibly related development is the construction of a large new hangar at the USAF’s flight-test center at Groom Lake, Nev. Unlike other buildings on the secluded site, it is screened from the closest public viewing point by a specially constructed berm.
www.aviationweek.com.../aw st_xml/2009/12/21/AW_12_21_2009_p26-191933.xml&headline=Classified+Bomber+Projects+Are+Under+Consideration
Originally posted by Phoebus
This is actually scary to read.
First off:
Everyone knows that Groom lake (Area 51) has the worlds longest airstrip.
So testing any plane here is idealy due to the extrem remote location and the strong gard points around that place.
Originally posted by intelgurl
Of course the other project I believe ongoing at Groom is the hypersonic low orbit attack/isr aircraft project by Lockheed.
Originally posted by curioustype
reply to post by intelgurl
I'm not so convinced, how, if they decided it has been politically OK to fly/deliver nukes on guided missiles for years, can it all of a sudden not be politically OK to fly/deliver them on a guided jet plane with a slightly different delivery/release mechanism?
Originally posted by intelgurl
ICBM's are autonomous with a hardcoded trajectory and target.
Unmanned aircraft so far are not.
Originally posted by _Del_
Originally posted by intelgurl
ICBM's are autonomous with a hardcoded trajectory and target.
Unmanned aircraft so far are not.
Oddly enough, this is one area where we've worked backwards: from completely autonomous "drones" to "remotely-piloted" (or "unmanned-" as in vogue now) aircraft.