It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Wrong. Health care shouldn't be a business in the first place.
The US is way behind the curve on this one.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I hear you! Let's be just like China -- lose our freedoms, confiscate land form farmers, and pay sh!t to workers. All in the sake of "competing". Let that skinny girl die and let her family go bankrupt because look, we still have a lot of mobility (downward) until we are like China.
By the way, last time I checked, German-made cars are highly competitive globally, and so it their other industrial product.
Since when does one have the moral right to reject a skinny girl and not give her treatment, in the name of profit?
Originally posted by MJsGhost
reply to post by buddhasystem
Since when does one have the moral right to reject a skinny girl and not give her treatment, in the name of profit?
Nobody is denying her treatment, they are just not going to insure someone that they know is going to cost more than they can charge her family. Her family is still free to get her treatment as long as they pay for it. She is, afterall, their responsibility, not the insurance companies.
what many people doesn't know so far is how Obama is paying for all this, well. . . Obama has been making deals behind close doors . . .,
EXCHANGE OF INTERESTS
In public, Obama often rails against special interests, accusing them of trying to jeopardize health care reform.
In fact, it is evident that he has been adopting a strategy of "exchanging interests" to make many interest groups jump on his bandwagon.
What the president is no telling he is selling us out because he needs to push his biggest accomplishment health care reform
U.S. drug companies, the first interest group to reach an agreement with the Obama administration, agreed to give the administration 80 billion U.S. dollars to cover some costs of the health care reform.
The U.S. Hospital Association, which represents the interests of major hospitals around the country, followed suit by offering to pay 155 billion U.S. dollars for Obama's health care reform.
In exchange, the Obama administration promised the two groups that it would reject any attempt from Congress to seek further reductions in federal payments to drug makers and hospitals under the government-run Medicare and Medicaid programs.
The American Medical Association, an interest group of doctors, offered their support for the reform on the condition that Obama would make sure payments made to them under the Medicare program wouldn't be cut by a big margin.
The American Nurses Association secured a similar deal.
As a result, insurance firms are virtually the only key interest group still firmly opposed to the reform.
But Obama has plans for reaching out to that group.
The president recently changed his mind and agreed to require individual Americans to buy health insurance. He had opposed the individual mandate during last year's presidential elections.
The new approach, which requires some 45 million Americans currently without health insurance to purchase insurance plans, would open up a new market for insurers.
Originally posted by MJsGhost
reply to post by buddhasystem
I am sure all the realtively healthy people and the businesses really appreciate what amounts to an 8% tax on both individuals and business.
The federal government tracks average spending on health insurance for people with job-based coverage. The most recent figures are from 2005, and indicate that the average individual's job-based premiums were $3,991 that year, while families spent an average of $10,728.
In 2007, the median annual household income rose 1.3% to $50,233.00 according to the Census Bureau.[4]