reply to post by dbates
You showed us this:
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, clearly stipulates: "And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them,
shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign
State."
Definition, Emolument: compensation received by virtue of holding an office or having employment
This ‘prize’ does not come from any of the above stated in your original post.
The actual emoluments clause is located at Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2 of the U. S. Constitution which states:
No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United
States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under
the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.
From the Wikipedia:
The purpose of the clause is twofold:
1) to protect separation of powers by ensuring that no member of the Executive or Judicial Branches of the Federal Government could simultaneously
serve in the Legislative Branch, and
2) to prevent Congress from conspiring to create offices or increase federal officials' salaries with the expectation that members of Congress would
later be appointed to these posts.
So, WTF??? What’s your point?? It looks like the info you got was totally misrepresented. Sounds like a conspiracy, man....