It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moocowman
The courts should also take this opportunity to have publishers of bibles immediately recall all copies in circulation and remove all references to the alleged power of praying to jesus.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This is not a case of this man "doing" something illegal. He was prayingl; exercising his religion.
I don't thiink there is a law that says you have to take a sick person to a doctor.
And where do you draw the line. How about the child who is sick, and does not appear to be very sick, but suddenly dies. Do his parents go to jail too?
Ah yes, those mandatory vaccinations. If a parent refuses to vaccinate his/her child and the child get sick and dies, are you going to want to press charges of neglect or murder?
Just sending these people to jail does not solve the problem and it is not fair to the accused who is also a victim. He is a victim of a big misunderstanding and has proceeded in full faith that this was not only OK, but was the best thing to do.
Originally posted by Jenna
Originally posted by moocowman
The courts should also take this opportunity to have publishers of bibles immediately recall all copies in circulation and remove all references to the alleged power of praying to jesus.
I can understand your point, but that does seem a bit extreme to me. It amounts to censoring and would contradict free speech, in my opinion. Not to mention that would contradict people's right to believe in whatever flavor of religion they prefer. This man and others like him can believe whatever they like, the exception being when it causes the death of another person.
This is not a case of this man "doing" something illegal. He was prayingl; exercising his religion.
Originally posted by moocowman
Yes and no, I believe the bibles should be cencored/rated in the same manner as a movie EG PG 18.
We have to bear in mind the bibles contain "instructions" on misogyny, rape, racial hatred, homophobia, pedophilia, genocide, etc.
Very true, but it's also important to keep in mind that many, if not most, people see the Bible as a piece of literature. Many of Shakespeare's works contained misogyny, racial hatred, pedophilia, genocide, patricide, etc., should they be censored and rated as well? I regard the Bible much the same way I do Shakespeare's plays. They are great literature and contain some important messages that are true regardless of the source, but I see neither as unadulterated truth. Perhaps it is my classification of them as similar that prevents me from being able to agree with you on this point?
Originally posted by OhZone
And that is your opinion. Children are in the care and keeping of their parents. His “intent” was to have her get well. That word “intent” is important in law, but many emotionals ignore it.
Have any vaccines been proven to work? If so, then you have nothing to worry about if during a pandemic your child associates with my unvaccinated child, do you?
WHO|Measles mortality reduction
Measles deaths worldwide fell by 74% between 2000 and 2007, from an estimated 750 000 to 197 000. In addition, the Eastern Mediterranean region has cut measles deaths by a remarkable 90% — from an estimated 96 000 to 10 000 — during the same period, thus achieving the United Nations goal to reduce measles deaths by 90% by 2010, three years early.
The significant decline in measles deaths in the Eastern Mediterranean region was the result of intensified vaccination campaigns including in countries with hard-to-reach areas such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, and the Sudan. In 2007, more than twice the number of children were immunized in the region through such campaigns as compared to 2006.