American Intelligence General Says 911 was an Inside Job

www.youtube.com...

well what is left to say he is an expert ...
2nd line

[edit on 8-7-2009 by BornPatriot]

reply to post by BornPatriot


He has been retired since 1984 so how would he know any great secrets about 911?

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by BornPatriot

 

He has been retired since 1984 so how would he know any great secrets about 911?

Because he has the ability to perform the analysis on the available evidence - far beyond what any other citizen could. Further he would also have access to material which retired military tend to through each other and old boys networks - he is not inferring that he has knowledge of an inside job - merely highlighting that from all the available evidence and the reasons offered by the official story is conclusion is that it was an inside job.

Has every right to do so, and his opinion carries significant weight due to his experience and powerful position -

incredible video.

Thread already exists here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I was under the impression that it was these very American Intelligence Generals who were part of 911.

SOSO.

Great.

Now we need him to provide some evidence...and a English version.

[edit on 7/8/2009 by Classified Info]

reply to post by grapesofraft


Well -- he is just stating the obivous.... what do you see the inside of someones rectum... ? I dont see wing impacts ... and I cant find the boeing either.... maybe if you look around real hard you might find one in there...

[edit on 8-7-2009 by BornPatriot]

Originally posted by audas

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by BornPatriot

 

He has been retired since 1984 so how would he know any great secrets about 911?

Because he has the ability to perform the analysis on the available evidence - far beyond what any other citizen could. Further he would also have access to material which retired military tend to through each other and old boys networks - he is not inferring that he has knowledge of an inside job - merely highlighting that from all the available evidence and the reasons offered by the official story is conclusion is that it was an inside job.

Has every right to do so, and his opinion carries significant weight due to his experience and powerful position -

incredible video.

You take into extremely false assumption that first of all this gentleman even worked for an Intelligence Unit, secondly that he even worked in a related and relevant profession in regards to such, and third, that any of the above somehow grants him the ability to reach conclusions which an average citizen could never do.

Also, there is no "Good Ol' Boy" network within the Military aside from the Bureaucrats that occupy certain suits and uniforms. Intelligence is all highly compartmentalized, especially within the MIL community, and his position certainly grants him no status privy to the knowledge which you and him are attempting to propagate here.

You take into extremely false assumption that first of all this gentleman even worked for an Intelligence Unit, secondly that he even worked in a related and relevant profession in regards to such, and third, that any of the above somehow grants him the ability to reach conclusions which an average citizen could never do.

Also, there is no "Good Ol' Boy" network within the Military aside from the Bureaucrats that occupy certain suits and uniforms. Intelligence is all highly compartmentalized, especially within the MIL community, and his position certainly grants him no status privy to the knowledge which you and him are attempting to propagate here.


well why dont you do us all a favor and look him up and reserch that he really isnt a good source instead of what you just said. Many ex military Are actually good sources of information for the simple reason alot of them still keep in touch with each other....John Lear is a good example

heres a question, if he was stating an opinion other than the one you hold, would you regard his testimony to be as valuable? if not, hes worthless as a witness.

Originally posted by TheAgentNineteen

Originally posted by audas

Originally posted by grapesofraft
reply to post by BornPatriot

 

He has been retired since 1984 so how would he know any great secrets about 911?

Because he has the ability to perform the analysis on the available evidence - far beyond what any other citizen could. Further he would also have access to material which retired military tend to through each other and old boys networks - he is not inferring that he has knowledge of an inside job - merely highlighting that from all the available evidence and the reasons offered by the official story is conclusion is that it was an inside job.

Has every right to do so, and his opinion carries significant weight due to his experience and powerful position -

incredible video.

You take into extremely false assumption that first of all this gentleman even worked for an Intelligence Unit, secondly that he even worked in a related and relevant profession in regards to such, and third, that any of the above somehow grants him the ability to reach conclusions which an average citizen could never do.

Also, there is no "Good Ol' Boy" network within the Military aside from the Bureaucrats that occupy certain suits and uniforms. Intelligence is all highly compartmentalized, especially within the MIL community, and his position certainly grants him no status privy to the knowledge which you and him are attempting to propagate here.

He knew the exact same way Bill Cooper predicted the attack, and then on 911, Bill Cooper immediatelly broadcast that this was a false flag attack orchestrated by the government to take away our rights and launch illegal wars. How did he do it? HES PSYCHIC DUH! Just kidding, it's cause these guys know how they work, and why they do things, and using their logic they can tell when something doesn't add up.

Please add any comments to the existing thread here.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thread closed.