$85 billion = $85,000,000,000.00
A little info on our base 10 numerical system for everyone:
1= one
10= ten
100=one hundred
1,000= one thousand =one thousand * one
10,000= ten thousand
100,000
1,000,000= one million = one thousand *(multiply) one thousand
10,000,000 = ten million
100,000,000= one hundred million
1,000,000,000= one billion = one million * one thousand
10,000,000,000=10 billion
(85,000,000,000= 85 billion)
100,000,000,000= one hundred billion
1,000,000,000,000= one trillion = one thousand * one billion
Yes I know it is useless information to most but I also know that there are some who do not understand how the decimal system works.
now for some math
$85 billion/260 million
since we are all on some kind of computer, please run your calculator program because I am not going to teach math online because it is hard enough to
teach in person. It astounds me how many people (including many with college degrees so it is not an intelligence problem) suck at basic and
intermediate math.
example for windows users= start/all programs/accessories/calculator If you have Excel or a spreadsheet program, that would be even better.
enter 85,000,000,000. there are no commas in the Windows calculator so count your zeros. One billion (see above) is 1 followed by 9 zeros (I should
say digits but zeros are easier to understand with rounded numbers) therefore 85 billion would be 85 followed by 9 zeros = 85,000,000,000
press the divide button which looks like a "/"
enter 260,000,000 since our number of people over 18 is supposedly 260 million. For redundancies sake one million is 1 followed by 6 zeros (see
above) therefore 260 million is 260 followed by 6 zeros
The number we get is $326.92 for each person.
I am sorry if I sound as if I am insulting the intelligence of the readers but I don't claim to be any more intelligent ( I do and say dumb things
like anyone else) than any of you people, even those that I disagree with, it is just that from my personal experience, with this topic as a prime
example, that math is severely lacking in this society and that fact is certainly reflected on our political and financial leaders who have been
running our economy into the ground.
As for the bailouts, I believe they are going to be more than 4.6 trillion.
www.voltagecreative.com...
lout-pie.png. There is even some talk it will be around the neighborhood of 7 trillion. That is 7 followed by 12 zeros. This is the standard
bailout money that is directly taxpayer funded plus the money that the Fed is dishing out. $7,000,000,000,000
$4.6 trillion divided by 260 million people =$17,692.31 for each person.
I don't know but I think that 17 grand in the hands of the population would spur the economy much more than giving trillions to the same buffoons
that screwed the economy in the first place. People would either pay off their bills which helps the credit markets, save and provide deposits to back
up bank loans, or spend which would drive the economy forward.
All the banks would do is hold on to that money just in case they needed it to back up their ratings in case the insurance on bad loans collapses.
Insurers would just use it to make sure that their policies can keep going and therefore protect bank ratings. None of it would spur the economy nor
free up credit except AIG executives taking vacations in posh resorts.
Now if the bailouts go to $7 trillion =$7,000,000,000,000
$7 trillion / 260 million people = $26,923.08 per person
What would boost the economy more? $27 grand in your hands to pay off bills, pad your savings, or spend on whatever or trillions going to bankers so
they can keep their jobs and prop up the same system that has already proved itself prone to collapse? Are the bankers gonna lend that money?
I would rather have that money in society's hands as cold hard cash rather than have it go through the system and come out as cold hard debt +
inflation because even if the credit markets start lending the bailout money we will have to pay it back.
The politicians take OUR money, GIVE it to the banks, so they can LEND it to us, and we have to PAY back to the banks plus INTEREST what we originally
GAVE them. Why there aren't people rioting in the streets or engaging in civil disobedience over this is perplexing.
By the way, if people put that kind of money into their checking or savings accounts, the bankers wouldn't need to worry as much about the loan
insurance collapsing and lower ratings requiring them to show cash deposits because they would have some kind of deposit to back up themselves up.
To end this, if any of my math above is incorrect, please say so, I sucked in high school and college algebra because I always make stupid mistakes.
[edit on 28-11-2008 by wutone]