It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The UK's biggest domestic energy supplier said that the price hikes would take place with immediate effect.
It blamed "soaring wholesale energy prices", but added that standard tariff prices would not rise again in 2008.
The move comes just a few days after rival EDF Energy put up gas prices by 22% and electricity prices by 17%, with other firms expected to follow suit.
Watchdog Energywatch said it believed the 35% gas bill rise was the biggest single increase in the price of a utility seen to date.
British Gas, which has 15.9 million customers, also announced that its profits for the first half of the year were down by 69% to £166m.
Originally posted by Ste2652
To answer points about nationalisation, I don't think the government could afford to do it. British Gas is worth billions, and most of our money is presently tied up in a certain bank that went bust.
What the government certainly could (and what I would do, were I in Gordon Brown's position) do is threaten to apply a big windfall tax to company profits - say, 20% or more - unless the companies bring their prices down, especially for the hardest hit. It's disgusting that some pensioners have to choose between heating their homes or eating. And this is in the UK, a highly developed nation, in 2008!
The energy market is not really a market. Despite there being different companies, it is not competitive. Yes, wholesale gas prices have gone up... but not by anywhere near the amount these companies are charging their customers. I wouldn't be surprised at all to learn that there had been some price fixing going on. I'd ask the Business and Enterprise Select Committee and the Department for Business and Enterprise (which has responsibility for the energy portfolio) to thoroughly investigate this and start hauling some corporate executives into Parliament to answer questions.
I'd be quite interested to see the terms under which British Gas was privatised. I have heard that there's a clause in there stating that a privatised version should primarily serve the public.
Originally posted by Ste2652
What the government certainly could (and what I would do, were I in Gordon Brown's position) do is threaten to apply a big windfall tax to company profits - say, 20% or more - unless the companies bring their prices down, especially for the hardest hit.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by Ste2652
What the government certainly could (and what I would do, were I in Gordon Brown's position) do is threaten to apply a big windfall tax to company profits - say, 20% or more - unless the companies bring their prices down, especially for the hardest hit.
This will only raise your gas prices even further. Do you really think the company will absorb a 20% increase in cost without passing it on to the consumer? If you put a 20% windfall tax on the company, they will only pass it on to you.
Central Asia
Jul 30, 2008
Russia takes control of Turkmen (world?) gas
By M K Bhadrakumar
There must be deep frustration in Washington. In sum, Russia has greatly strengthened its standing as the principal gas supplier to Europe. It not only controls Central Asia's gas exports but has ensured that gas from the region passes across Russia and not through the alternative trans-Caspian pipelines mooted by the US and EU. Also, a defining moment has come. The era of cheap gas is ending. Other gas exporters will cite the precedent of the price for Turkmen gas. European companies cannot match Gazprom's muscle. Azerbaijan becomes a test case. Equally, Russia places itself in a commanding position to influence the price of gas in the world market. A gas cartel is surely in the making. The geopolitical implications are simply profound for the US. Full Text
The overall implications of these Russian moves are very serious for the US and EU campaign to get the Nabucco gas pipeline project going....
But with access denied to Turkmen gas, Nabucco's viability becomes doubtful. And, without Nabucco, the entire US strategy of reducing Europe's dependence on Russian energy supplies makes no sense. Therefore, Washington is faced with Hobson's choice. Friday's agreements in Ashgabat mean that Nabucco's realization will now critically depend on gas supplies from the Middle East - Iran, in particular. Turkey is pursuing the idea of Iran supplying gas to Europe and has offered to mediate in the US-Iran standoff.