It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The JW's have no compelling desire for families to produce children, nor would they ever encourage someone to commit adultery.
Originally posted by blindtheory
Part of what defines a cult is that they isolate their members (Jehovah's Witnesses are taught they are no part of the "world").
They practice information control: JW's are counseled to only read what their Headquarters prints for them, they are advised to stay off of the internet, and they are told not to attend college.
I was not allowed to hang out with anyone who was not a JW when I was a kid, and taught that they were just going to die when God killed them in a few years any ways so why let " bad associations spoil useful habits."
Originally posted by blindtheory
They practice information control: JW's are counseled to only read what their Headquarters prints for them
they are advised to stay off of the internet
and they are told not to attend college.
Originally posted by BritishGent
The previous comments about smacking/spanking their children i can also confirm is true of my cousins. They were punished severly for any kind of bad or child like behaviour. Indeed my parents used to use the threat of sending me to my aunts house to stop me misbehaving.
This of course might not be something relation to religion, merely just their way of parenting.
The reason why i believe that JW is a cult is as has been mentioned before the way they don't allow members/followers to talk to or socialise with non-followers. My youngest cousin was 20 last year. They found out that she had slept with someone which is one of their 'sins' as she was not married to this person. She was made an outcast of the religion 'discommunicated' for want of a better word for a certain time period. During this period no J.W was allowed to acknowledge her existance. This meant her own family had to ignore her for weeks if not months.
9I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— 10not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. 11But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.
12What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13God will judge those outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you."
There were similar problems when a marriage fell apart. One of my older cousins found out that her husband had quit his job and created debts of £30,000 without her knowing. But she was not allowed to divorce him, apparently because he had not commited adultery, if she did then she too would be discommunicated.
(Matthew 19:8-9) . . .. 9 I say to YOU that whoever divorces his wife, except on the ground of fornication, and marries another commits adultery.”
Originally posted by Relentless
What actually cinches it for me is that ANY religion who insists they are the only ones to be saved are NOT christians.
Originally posted by blindtheory
The only reason you see JW's on this internet site is because they are anonymous. Ask them if they discuss with any other JW's about being on this site and I am sure they would tell you no. Ask them if they would be comfortable with letting an "elder" sit in the room with them while they browsed their usual sites and I'm sure the answer again would be no.
Originally posted by BritishGent
How would this affect a situation in the workplace? Would all J.W's have to ignore their fellow employee? Just intrigued.
Originally posted by BritishGent
reply to post by Sparky63
Sparky63, thanks very much for your reply. That's certainly given an insight to those points i raised.
Yes i do remember her saying that after a certain period of time, if she was repentent then she would be let back into the fellowship. But one question i have is, doesn't the bible say something about "let he without sin cast the first stone?".
Surely someone shouldn't be cast aside for 6 weeks before they are allowed to repent?
How would this affect a situation in the workplace? Would all J.W's have to ignore their fellow employee? Just intrigued.