It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
By Scott Lindlaw
ASSOCIATED PRESS
October 8, 2004
WASHINGTON – President Bush and his vice president conceded yesterday in the clearest terms yet that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, trying to shift the Iraq war debate to a new issue – whether the invasion was justified because Hussein was abusing a U.N. oil-for-food program.
This is news? This article was dated almost 3 years ago.
Originally posted by SwatMedic
This is news? This article was dated almost 3 years ago.
The Bush hater crowd will do anything to build their numbers and defame the govt.....even if it means dragging up 3 year old stories.
I think this is relevant because we still have people here who positively INSIST that Iraq had WMD and they really went to Syria/Iran/Zimbabwe/Luxembourg/Tau Ceti/insert random enemy here...
Originally posted by SwatMedic
The Bush hater crowd will do anything to build their numbers and defame the govt.....even if it means dragging up 3 year old stories.
Originally posted by SwatMedic
I believe that yes, at one time Iraq did indeed have WMD's. Gassing of the Kurds shows that. Maybe they used them all up on the Kurds, or destroyed them or moved them but they HAD them at one point.