It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why Did NASA Pay $26.6 Million to families of Columbia Astronauts?

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 05:05 PM
link   
Is this logical? Didn't they volunteer for this mission?

What about all the soldiers in Iraq? Do their families get the same compensation? Are they not worth as much?

How can they justify the worth of any person to be more than another?

$26.6 Million to Shuttle Family Survivors


NASA paid $26.6 million to family members of the astronauts who died on the space shuttle Columbia in 2003, a newspaper reported Sunday, citing recently released documents.

Documents obtained by the Orlando Sentinel through a federal Freedom of Information Act request show that former FBI Director William Webster helped negotiate out-of-court settlements with the families.

NASA obtained money for the settlement through a congressional appropriation in 2004, NASA spokesman Allard Beutel said.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.




[edit on 15-4-2007 by Realtruth]



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Well I would suppose that they were able to do it because the number of
people killed was low enough that it would not create a huge amount of
money being given out.

As to why, well even though the Astronauts did volunteer, the shuttle
was not supposed to blow-up.

A soldier volunteers, going into service knowing that there is a
considerably high chance they Will die.

An Astronaut volunteers to go on a mission where the chance of dieing
is so low that it is not considered.



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by iori_komei
Well I would suppose that they were able to do it because the number of
people killed was low enough that it would not create a huge amount of
money being given out.

As to why, well even though the Astronauts did volunteer, the shuttle
was not supposed to blow-up.

A soldier volunteers, going into service knowing that there is a
considerably high chance they Will die.

An Astronaut volunteers to go on a mission where the chance of dieing
is so low that it is not considered.



Well I will agree with your statement about soldiers and higher chance of dying, but $26.6 million?

How about other federal employees that are not at high risk? Do their familes get the same level of compensation?

I ask these questions because I know that their are individuals on this site that remember almost every article, in regards to lawsuits and compensation.

Thanks RT



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Guess what I just found?

The risks of a shuttle launch NASA says odds of dying 1 in 100, but worth it.


WASHINGTON — The seven crew members of the space shuttle Discovery will arrive at Kennedy Space Center today to take one of the biggest risks of their lives. They have a 1-in-100 chance of dying during their spaceflight next month.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.



Does anyone know what the odds of a soldier dying are?

[edit on 15-4-2007 by Realtruth]



posted on Apr, 15 2007 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth
How about other federal employees that are not at high risk? Do their families get the same level of compensation?


I doubt it, but than when you think about it, astronauts who are
performing experiments in space are doing a more important job than
the guy that calls you reminding you that you need to pay your taxes.

Actually, being an astronaut probably has a much higher chance of living
than the other career.





Does anyone know what the odds of a soldier dying are?


There is no one answer, it really depends on where the soldier is being
sent, the odds of a soldier in Iraq dieing are much higher than a soldier
in South Korea, or in America.

Also, the odds of a soldier in Afghanistan dieing are different from the
odds of a soldier in Iraq dieing as well.


I'm not really sure anyone has actually ever done the math to figure
out the odds to tell you the truth.



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 01:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth


How about other federal employees that are not at high risk? Do their familes get the same level of compensation?


How bout you stop pouting and knock off the guilt trip? No one is going to be sorry for you because none of your family members decided to become astronauts. This payment means there are people who work for NASA that should not be working for NASA, it is a guise to veil the incompetancy of its workers, not at large, but exposes an even greater circumstance: NASA's hiring practices are extremely questionable. Or consider this, if NASA had payed the extra $26.6 million to contractors on the lowest of bids, this may never have happened, so thank the guys in Congress and the Senate who decide that American lives are not worth an extra $26.6 million because later on the $26.6 million when payed to families will be worth less than the time when it was truely needed.



posted on Apr, 16 2007 @ 04:17 PM
link   
Common man... I get what your saying, but I think your at it all wrong..

I am happy that NASA gave those family members the million they got.. they are America's leading scientist, bravely going into space for this country even with the considerable risk.. well worth it imo, we should honor such endeavors and repay them. We treat scientist and such in America like scum, when they should be at the height of society.

As for the soldiers, I agree we need to pay out far more to wounded and dead soldiers, but millions is absurd, and simply not possible..

You need to remain realistic..



posted on Sep, 5 2008 @ 09:17 PM
link   
its litigeous even at this level...it was settled out of court.



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join